Quote from: NewNoise on June 21, 2013, 01:09:04 PM
what about the new streaming that a1ex released? is gonna improve buffering on the 600d?
Where is that located?

Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: NewNoise on June 21, 2013, 01:09:04 PM
what about the new streaming that a1ex released? is gonna improve buffering on the 600d?
Quote from: Andy600 on June 14, 2013, 01:06:12 PM
Where is this raw footage? I've only seen Prores and I haven't seen any official BM announcements about final release specs
Quote from: Andy600 on June 14, 2013, 11:51:15 AM
The BM Pocket CC doesn't shoot raw video yet and it will not ship with raw recording features afaik. It's a concept and you don't know what additional equipment you may actually need....but yes, I still want one too
Quote from: gebo on June 05, 2013, 08:10:43 PM
Yes I can confirm the exposure shifting is an ACR issue. The recording is ok.
Still have to find a solution...
Quote from: 1% on June 01, 2013, 12:59:37 AM
DCRAW or UFRAW should open them. Yea, they are sraw sized.
Quote from: a1ex on June 01, 2013, 01:01:02 AM
Also try dcraw -e *.CR2
Quote from: 1% on May 31, 2013, 03:32:29 PM
I haven't had this happen, how fast is the card?
Going to try less aggressive allocation on this camera and see if it helps since now its not eating memory away. 6D is fine with 4MB backup. If pink frames got worse some maybe this is why.
Quote from: N/A on May 27, 2013, 01:38:49 AM
Robrock, go to the first post of this thread, to the link where you get TL 2.0. Download the top two on the page, paste the contents of "aspect lock" onto your card, then replace the existing raw_rec module with the new one (edmac kill, have to rename it to just raw_rec.mo).
Quote from: apefos on May 25, 2013, 09:19:28 PM
I installed everything again carefully and now things are working ok for 640 x 640 in my Sandisk Extreme 45MB/s (I have three of these so I would like to avoid buy another card) It works for 960 x 402 also, but does not work for 920 x 518 (skip frames), so...
Fingers crossed for the 854 x 480 because it is the same datarate of 640 x 640, my only hopes for 16:9 now !!!
Quote from: Andy600 on May 26, 2013, 02:22:30 AM
I misunderstood your question earlier. My apologies
When others are referring to the modes they mean they are shooting raw but video mode (normal Canon video mode) is set to 720p or 1080p etc. In 720p it will line skip and the image will look squashed in a similar way to anamorphic but squashed vertically as opposed to horizontally. You can correct this by multiplying the height by x1.66 but leave the width the same. This is more prone to aliasing but means you save a little on filesize (i.e. get more frames/time or be able to shoot a wider frame). 1080p and 480p will appear in a normal aspect ratio. The video size does not correspond to the raw video size. You set that independently in the raw_rec module.
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 10 queries.