Author Topic: Canon EOS R / RP  (Read 37711 times)

oc_masta

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #75 on: May 05, 2019, 06:29:29 PM »
Can someone with far more intelligence than me, explain the high level concept of what needs doing and how it works.

Is it a hunt for the memory addresses than respond to the things we need. LED at address xxxxxxx, memory for sensor data at xxxxxx ??

I'm genuinely very curious and would love to learn more if someone can break it down just a little.
Cool Stuff!

kitor

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 130
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #76 on: May 05, 2019, 07:26:20 PM »
Up to now, mostly like you described.
Quote
Is it a hunt for the memory addresses than respond to the things we need. LED at address xxxxxxx, memory for sensor data at xxxxxx ??

But not only for hardware memory addresses, but also for location of needed DryOS functions that we need to call. In 'normal' programming you just include headers for some library and use it. Here you need to find that stuff in disassembled ROM first, understand how it works, what parameters it can take (and thus how to call it). This is already mostly done with previous cameras, so you just need to find proper memory location that holds your needed function. Later also find how to 'hook' into Canon tasks to get data from them, etc.

And DryOS (and low level stuff - new Digic processors) changes with time. That's why Alex did 'fishy' M50 port that allows ML menu access, but it breaks things for older devices so he decided not to push code until he sorts this out.
EOS R

sast

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #77 on: May 18, 2019, 08:52:46 PM »
Hello,
is there somebody, who is still working on ML for Canon EOS R?  >:(

Before I was using ML on the Canon 5D III. ML gave me an perfectin handling of the camera.
I don't now how to do all the things on the EOS R without ML (f. e. Intervalometer, Motion detection, the modules). 

Best regards from Germany

Walter Schulz

  • Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6901
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #78 on: May 18, 2019, 09:10:34 PM »
It's mantra time again ...

If there is no ML for your cam act like there will be no ML for your cam ever.
Photogs and videographers: Assist in proof reading upcoming in-camera help!. Your input is wanted and needed!

kitor

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 130
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #79 on: May 18, 2019, 11:17:17 PM »
Hello,
is there somebody, who is still working on ML for Canon EOS R?  >:(

Refer to this. No posts = no news.

Quote
f. e. Intervalometer, Motion detection,
So we have something in common (had to bring notebook with me last time I suddenly needed intervalometer). However I risked a lot to my camera (as seen in this thread) to at least try to make it happen.
EOS R

sast

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #80 on: May 24, 2019, 07:06:44 PM »
Hello kitor,
thanx for your work to make it happen.
Everyday I take a look in this forum to see the development.
Best regards from Germany

DaGentooBoy

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #81 on: June 25, 2019, 03:38:39 PM »
I have been using/watching ML for years on several different cameras. I love the flexibility that ML provides and I am really excited about the 4k options that ML has brought to the newer cameras.

I recently upgraded to an EOS R and I was trying to find the version of QEMU that works with the R as well as the current progress mapping functions. I have a background in embedded programming and hardware design. If someone can help me get caught up I can try to lend a hand.

johannjr2

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #82 on: July 13, 2019, 04:05:16 PM »
Is there a patreon page where we can support the development of certain cameras like the EOS R/ RP or even 5d mark IV (any newer canon with dual pixel autofocus). Thanks in advance!

Walter Schulz

  • Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6901
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #83 on: July 14, 2019, 08:07:56 PM »
No
Photogs and videographers: Assist in proof reading upcoming in-camera help!. Your input is wanted and needed!

sast

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #84 on: July 16, 2019, 10:14:25 PM »
Warum so eine unfreundliche Antwort auf eine gute Frage?

kitor

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 130
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #85 on: July 17, 2019, 07:45:04 AM »
Warum so eine unfreundliche Antwort auf eine gute Frage?
Która odpowiedź jest niegrzeczna?*

English, please.  ::)

Sorry, had to.
EOS R

reddeercity

  • Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2096
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #86 on: July 17, 2019, 07:56:00 AM »
Warum so eine unfreundliche Antwort auf eine gute Frage?
Google say it's German -  the translation  "why such a rude answer to a good question"
not sue what there are referring to thou

kitor

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 130
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #87 on: July 17, 2019, 09:18:35 AM »
Thats why I asked my question - in Polish :) (I understand German enough for his post)
For 'when' question no wonder answer was rude. For donations, it was short but not rude.
Maybe it's better to remove those posts asking for dates, instead of replying like this every time...
EOS R

Ant123

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 121
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #88 on: July 17, 2019, 12:14:00 PM »
2 Walter Schulz and other moderators

Why don't you oblige new users to read the FAQ before they can post? And then delete dumb messages / ban them.
There is no advertising on this forum. So why do we need to see their useless posts?

Walter Schulz

  • Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6901
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #89 on: July 17, 2019, 08:51:18 PM »
First: I'm not a moderator (and have no intention to be one, better for the forum and me).

I cannot imagine a foolproof system to avoid such messages. You will always have an amount of people not reading FAQs or unable to grab the concepts of ML development or just feeling entitled (list not complete) or really, really believing they are helping. And such issues are not exclusive to newbies.

Noise by such users is bearable IMO. In "slow" forum times like this it may appear like an increase. No need for drastic measures (again: IMO).
Photogs and videographers: Assist in proof reading upcoming in-camera help!. Your input is wanted and needed!

vlasena

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #90 on: August 05, 2019, 11:24:20 AM »
Also would love to see ML for EOS R. Any info on signature and decryption of these cameras?

Thanks!

71m363nd3r

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #91 on: August 07, 2019, 12:00:07 AM »
Also would love to see ML for EOS R. Any info on signature and decryption of these cameras?

Thanks!

How much bucks would you donate for ML contribution for EOS R?

sast

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #92 on: August 13, 2019, 06:31:19 AM »
150 € - 200 €

jga

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #93 on: August 16, 2019, 05:21:48 PM »

71m363nd3r

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #94 on: August 17, 2019, 08:34:06 PM »
150 € - 200 €
Me too.

You can start with 50€ the link is here https://magiclantern.fm/donate.html
when you see progress you can pay another 50€
And when is finally out you can use it first, before others by donating the rest.
And now show it that you meant it for real with donating.

Travis

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #95 on: August 20, 2019, 11:44:17 PM »
It would be absolutely incredible ML came to the RP. It'd be a game changer in terms of price / performance for a full frame. They seem very protective of their cinema line though.

Too bad you can't fork the firmware and charge money for it without running into issues
Current Toys:
Canon 6d : 5d2 : T4i, T3i : 16-35mm 2.8f L : 50mm 1.4f : 85mm 1.8f : 70-200mm 2.8f IS L : Cinevate Atlas 10 : Manfrotto Fluid Heads/Tripods : 4ft Jib : Steadicam Merlin : etc...
Full time producer at a video production company in Minneapolis MN: http://www.providfilms.com

kitor

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 130
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #96 on: August 23, 2019, 12:12:22 PM »
R firmware 1.3: https://www.canon.co.uk/support/consumer_products/products/cameras/digital_slr/eos-r.html?type=firmware
Quote
Firmware Version 1.3.0 incorporates the following enhancement:
1. Support for the RF24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM lens has been added.

RP firmware 1.2: https://www.canon.co.uk/support/consumer_products/products/cameras/digital_slr/eos-rp.html?type=firmware
Quote
Firmware Version 1.2.0 incorporates the following enhancement and fix:
1. Support for the RF24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM lens has been added.
2. Corrects a phenomenon in which the top of some captured images may be dark during high-speed sync shooting with an external flash.

No mentions about fixes for recent vulnerabilities.
EOS R

Sapporo

  • Freshman
  • **
  • Posts: 83
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #97 on: August 24, 2019, 10:07:12 AM »
R firmware 1.3: https://www.canon.co.uk/support/consumer_products/products/cameras/digital_slr/eos-r.html?type=firmware
RP firmware 1.2: https://www.canon.co.uk/support/consumer_products/products/cameras/digital_slr/eos-rp.html?type=firmware
No mentions about fixes for recent vulnerabilities.
Not fixed. https://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=24385.msg219582#msg219582
"EOS R firmware version 1.3.0 and earlier, EOS RP firmware version 1.2.0 and earlier, EOS RP GOLD firmware version 1.2.0 and earlier"

kitor

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 130
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #98 on: August 24, 2019, 11:41:15 PM »
This info was published before those firmware were even mentioned elsewhere, so I assumed it was an error.
But yes, that makes sense.
EOS R

Sapporo

  • Freshman
  • **
  • Posts: 83
Re: Canon EOS R / RP
« Reply #99 on: August 25, 2019, 08:23:37 AM »
This info was published before those firmware were even mentioned elsewhere, so I assumed it was an error.
But yes, that makes sense.
CVE-2019-6001 published 6 August, firmware 1.3.0 published 7 August. 1.3.0 was already ready.