I was editing some holiday footage and this was too cute not to share. An Indian elephant covered in red dirt.
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: names_are_hard on April 23, 2025, 01:32:46 AMIs that unusual? I merged one of the crop_rec branches in, so perhaps it's that.
I am in all the channels and don't have any muted, just say hi. questions-and-chat is the best place to start.
Quote from: names_are_hard on April 19, 2025, 07:22:31 PMCool - the repo is here: https://github.com/reticulatedpines/magiclantern_simplified/I certainly have questions as I managed to record 2.5k and 2.8k on my Canon 70D.... Which channel on discord are the developers hiding in.
Should build easily on modern linux. Debian is preferred over Ubuntu (they have a bug around Qemu). Is known to build on WSL or Mac.
I strongly recommend joining Discord for asking dev questions - you'll get answers a lot faster, and in more detail.
Quote from: names_are_hardHeder made useful progress last year but didn't come back to finish it off: https://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=13746.625
I've re-implemented everything to a similar level as in that post but with cleaned up code. Not yet pushed to my repo since it's unstable and missing some pieces. Happy to share if you want to work on that cam.
Quote from: Walter Schulz on April 08, 2025, 04:46:59 PMAt least strong indication. 5D4 and R may use the same sensor type. At least 1080p30 mode seems not to use line skipping (not sure I tested 60 fps).
BTW: 7D2 doesn't use line skipping either. The only Canon APS-C DSLR AFAIK.
BTW2: I kicked pre-ML from my R. Just beyond useless.
Quote from: names_are_hard on April 04, 2025, 11:28:30 PMYup, discord is the best place for quick discussion.I think the Canon R is a logical choice for me as I like to shoot with vintage lenses and I have a lot of TV lenses which can be adapted to it.
6D2 is in the reliable early port stage. This would let you have fair confidence that what's there (not much), works. R is Digic 8. None of these cams are reliable yet. If you enjoy debugging, we'd welcome the help on Digic 8 (maybe I won't have to do it!). If you prefer reverse engineering and normal dev work, 6D2 is a more obvious choice.
If you'd prefer to avoid reverse engineering, and stick to normal dev work - there's still lots to do on well supported cams. The good parts of various forks want merging into official repo, known bugs want fixing, menus could do with a re-org and cleanup. Etc!
Quote from: names_are_hard on April 01, 2025, 07:29:38 PMWhat do you mean by testing? If you mean doing dev work and testing that, then yes, it would help. Purely running tests can be useful, but we're not limited by test effort, so it doesn't speed things up.
I own a 6D2 (and wrote the port), it doesn't have many features yet so it's quick to test
It's a great cam though, size of a 70D with build quality of 5D, you won't be sad if you get one.
Page created in 0.129 seconds with 11 queries.