Guys, I'm sorry for being obviously dumb or something like that, but I don't understand why I can't take silent pics with exposure time longer than 16s with the nightly build from builds.magiclantern.fm (700D.114) when it seems to be possible according to this thread.
The link from @josevpn doesn't work anymore, https://bitbucket.org/Gr3g01/magic-lantern-frsp-long-expo/ is gone, and the PR is declined - because of "monkey patching"??
However, I found it here, updated it with the addresses from @hillibilli

This is my compiled build: https://arxius.io/f/110e49fb
My question is: if this is possible, and working, why is it not merged? To me it is more important to have a feature that works rather than it being a "clean" solution.
Also, I think that I read somewhere (this forum and it's thread's are faar to huge IMO, to figure something out the first thing I have to do is sit down for two hours and read the forum), that somebody has found a workaround for the faster-than-~300ms-problem. If so, can somebody point me in the right direction?
And maybe we can do a list of features being implemented, but not currently in the nightly builds, and features declined? Like, things for testing, funny things nobody wants, etc.
Well, maybe there already is. Sorry for being dumb and not reading it all (the overview of all threads, and also all those 40 pages of this thread), I don't have the capacity for it IMO.
PS: Just noticed the code also still is here, it's @milank's version with support for the cams with bulb dial mode - I think?
The link from @josevpn doesn't work anymore, https://bitbucket.org/Gr3g01/magic-lantern-frsp-long-expo/ is gone, and the PR is declined - because of "monkey patching"??
However, I found it here, updated it with the addresses from @hillibilli
Quote from: hillibilli on August 31, 2016, 08:00:19 PMAaaand now my first 5 minute test-exposure worked very well
I have a 700D.114 and there the address of capture_err_time_addr is different to the value from @josepvm:
capture_err_time_addr = 0xff1e1dd8
The address of
bulb_end_addr is the same as @josepvm posted = 0x24960

This is my compiled build: https://arxius.io/f/110e49fb
My question is: if this is possible, and working, why is it not merged? To me it is more important to have a feature that works rather than it being a "clean" solution.
Also, I think that I read somewhere (this forum and it's thread's are faar to huge IMO, to figure something out the first thing I have to do is sit down for two hours and read the forum), that somebody has found a workaround for the faster-than-~300ms-problem. If so, can somebody point me in the right direction?
And maybe we can do a list of features being implemented, but not currently in the nightly builds, and features declined? Like, things for testing, funny things nobody wants, etc.
Well, maybe there already is. Sorry for being dumb and not reading it all (the overview of all threads, and also all those 40 pages of this thread), I don't have the capacity for it IMO.
PS: Just noticed the code also still is here, it's @milank's version with support for the cams with bulb dial mode - I think?