Andrew, I just discovered your tool, and suffice to say I am incredibly impressed. The last time I took a deep dive into ML Raw post-production tools, there was much function (great) with terrible design and layout choices. This software is a breath of fresh air. When you package features with slick design, expect an audience to grow, good sir. Again, very impressed.
I just submitted an enhancement issue requesting tool-tips. First-time users often hover over buttons and want to know functionality before clicking. While the text-based Readme file is useful for explaining the software's purpose and keyboard controls, it can't and doesn't break down the visual elements. I hope to see a short description for each visual button on-screen. If you would like, I can write the tool-tips up and PM them to you to save you time. Let me know if that would be helpful or not for you.
Additionally, integrating the documentation (i.e. About--> Help/Manual) inside the software would be swell as well. Many end-users don't think to check the Readme file (or keep it long enough to check it) and only go looking for help once they think a feature is missing or are running into a problem which is likely just a user error.
Anyway, I'm just being a proponent of fool-proofing the tool you've designed because the easier it is to use, the easier it is to just pass on to someone new without sending them to a forum / website to figure it out.
I would expect when MLV gets standardized and publicly released that a workflow standard will battle itself out. At this rate, assuming batch encoding shows up soon for this application, I hope it becomes the, or one of the, gold standards. Simplicity and beauty meets function. Recognition is well deserved.
Edit: BTW, I endorse the earlier suggestion of making 'Mark In' and 'Mark Out' I and O respectively, as that is relatively standard for video prep and editing. Again, if someone didn't read, that's what they would press on the keyboard. Cheers!