This really does help, and I can't wait to see your music videos and the short film shot on the 550D RAW. Really eager to see.
Derrick, can't wait to see what you've shot. The question is, does a workflow lose quality? I used Ginger HDR on some stuff I shot recently and honestly I am having a little bit of a tough time seeing the difference. Which made me a bit disappointed. But I'm thinking maybe that's because of GingerHDR importing directly into Premiere? I'll post the video unlisted shortly so you can see.
Thanks!
[/quote]
http://youtu.be/a5TtDB6-h30
Jack I did add some color and contrast to the video but no sharpness. I did have more blue and details in the sky in another clip in Resolve but the anamorphic framing was not right so I started over in AE.I should have used a closeup of him on the bench, because he's a little soft. We have two more scenes to shoot before this movie is in the can. The DN x HD file from AE is 5gb. This Quicktime file is 745mb.
I could not add the audio track because I did not get from the director and he's out of town until this weekend. I don't think I have seen one raw video and heard its ambiance soundtrack? I will start using the waveform and vectorscopes in Resolve from now on.
We shot the final scenes of another short film a month ago in H.264. Why? Because we shot the other scenes a year ago and I was really new to raw so, looking back, I think I played it safe. Ha ha ha.. I should have that footage this weekend. I'll upload a scene to show the difference between H.264 and raw.
Ginger HDR is awesome because you can drop raw files straight into AE/PP and you save hard drive space by not needing dng's or tiffs. If you can't "see the difference" with how it handle the colors try AE or Resolve for that part of the workflow. I have not used it yet but can say Ginger is worth the price because the two things mentioned above. Unless there is a free program that does what it do...
More time is needed using the raw workflow but the results are well worth it.