5D2 RAW video Builds 14-Bit

Started by a.d., May 20, 2013, 05:27:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Doyle4

Quote from: neopixel on June 23, 2013, 11:14:36 PM
Yep! LV is movie mode!
But now I'd noticed something very stange:I own a 24-105mm; in crop mode (x5):
when shooting at 24mm: image is perfect
when shooting at 105mm: pink image

Fps overide is set on 24fps exact...

I didn't had this problem with the previous build that I used (14th june)

UPDATE: just to be specific it's working perfectly with resolution 1920 but not higher (used to work just fine before)

UPDATE 2: pink image with aspect ratio at 2:1 in crop mode; perfect image at 2:35

Make sure u are using latest RAW2DNG  also

neopixel

Quote from: Doyle4 on June 24, 2013, 01:24:37 AM
Make sure u are using latest RAW2DNG  also

Yes! I actually am! I think like moet_chandon, it looks completely ramdom....

reddeercity

Hello All  :)

Just testing out the New Build From June 21.
I had the June 4th built until now,
I see a big boost in speed for slower Card,
Test out my Scandisk 600x 90MB/s 32 GB
the best i could do before was 1720x864 & 1880x752.
Now i get 1880x800 24p @ 57.3-60.1 MB/s Continuous Recording :D

On my Lexar 1000x 32 GB , with the June 22 Built
1856x928 24p @ 68.7-69.1MB/s with frame over ride on
Crop mode : 2048x856 24p Continuous Recording
Before non crop mode was 1880x854 24p, Crop 2048x820 24p

I didn't see any benefit to use the 22nd built on the Scandisk,
But Gain a little more Frame size with the Lexar
:)

noix222

new build is killing it ! smooth RAW.  thankS


dariSSight#1

Quote from: reddeercity on June 24, 2013, 05:57:37 AM
Hello All  :)

Just testing out the New Build From June 21.
I had the June 4th built until now,
I see a big boost in speed for slower Card,
Test out my Scandisk 600x 90MB/s 32 GB
the best i could do before was 1720x864 & 1880x752.
Now i get 1880x800 24p @ 57.3-60.1 MB/s Continuous Recording :D

On my Lexar 1000x 32 GB , with the June 22 Built
1856x928 24p @ 68.7-69.1MB/s with frame over ride on
Crop mode : 2048x856 24p Continuous Recording
Before non crop mode was 1880x854 24p, Crop 2048x820 24p

I didn't see any benefit to use the 22nd built on the Scandisk,
But Gain a little more Frame size with the Lexar
:)


I might have to go back to the June 21st build, it seems more stable I'm getting pink RAW footage. I don't know if its the .013 raw2dng.app or the June 22nd build it does sucks but we always have to keep in mind We Are On The Bleeding Edge.

Doyle4

22nd build seems fine to me, only thing iv noticed is the text stays yellow even though my card can capture continuos

UPDATE: 24th released gunna try this bad boy now :) Thanks a.d. :)

ted ramasola

Since it was a supermoon weekend, here's a frame from raw video i shot.
Using 5D2 with nikkor 80-200mm f2.8 at 200mm + 2x teleconverter + MLraw 3x crop = a 1,200mm shot ? :)

5DmkII  / 7D
www.ramasolaproductions.com
Texas

dariSSight#1

Good Day Fellow Cinematic Revolutionists,

I see that you guys gave us an option to choose 1880 or 1872 resolution, the display of the resolution is very Cool also. My understanding of the option is that 1880 is the resolution Canon software coding allow from the sensor, the 1872 option is the exact 1/3 breakdown of the sensor ML coding and that allow for smoother file conversion without loosing quality from Canon's Sensor coding.

duncanidaho25

@ ted ramasola

https://vimeo.com/69038125

You and I had similar ideas!


5D2
180mm 2.8 Nikon
2x Converter Bower
Raw workflow
shot at 1728x 736 23.96 fps with 3x crop mode
12 GB file joined together (~4 minutes)
DNGs created with Rawanizer .5.5
dngs color graded in ACR
Resized with Red Giant's "Instant HD" in After Effects CS6
Rendered in Premiere CS6
5D2 |  VAF-5d2b | Komputerbay 64GB 1000x  | 14, 24, 35, 85 Samyang Lens Set  | 50, 180 Nikon | Marshall V-LCD51 | DigiFinder | 528s LED Amaran lights

Yoshiyuki Blade

@ted ramasola & duncanidaho25: Nice, I got a shot of the supermoon a couple days ago too! I just have a cheapo Canon 300mm lens though. Lots of atmospheric distortions were visible. I compared it to a shot I took a couple years ago of a regular full moon and it was indeed a little bigger!

edit: Btw, the moon was also a yellow/light orange in appearance at the time of the shot and it turns out that way in post when I use the same setup I have for regular daylight. What do you guys think about white balancing it to make it gray?

Indianac

https://vimeo.com/68982034 Thought I'd share. First time out. Shots were really underexposed, having so much information to recover anyways was incredible.  Anyone know why it came out more underexposed than I had seen in the LV?  Jun 22 build.

araucaria

Quote from: Yoshiyuki Blade on June 24, 2013, 11:18:54 PM
@ted ramasola & duncanidaho25: Nice, I got a shot of the supermoon a couple days ago too! I just have a cheapo Canon 300mm lens though. Lots of atmospheric distortions were visible. I compared it to a shot I took a couple years ago of a regular full moon and it was indeed a little bigger!

edit: Btw, the moon was also a yellow/light orange in appearance at the time of the shot and it turns out that way in post when I use the same setup I have for regular daylight. What do you guys think about white balancing it to make it gray?

Well, you have to turn the slider to the left = less temperature. But the surroundings will become more blue.

reddeercity

hello  :)
Test the new June 24th built,
like the new option for frame size nice choice to have, i can use what works for me :D
Frame size overlay nice,  from my point of view i think we are hitting the wall at 70.2MB/s
i have notice that if the recorded frames Start to write @ about 67 MB/s and Pecks at no more then 69.3 MB/s
This will maintain Continuous Recording. But if the write speed Starts to high (68.9MB/s) and perks @ 70.2 MB/s
It will not be stable in writing to card or you get Corrupted Frames.

variable buffing is the key to more Stable Frame sizes, &  by Stable i mean "maintain Continuous Recording"
@ any given size.
With this built 1856x928 24p frame over ride on, @68.3-69.1 MB/s Continuous
Crop mode 1600x1076 24p @ 68.5-69.1 MB/s Continuous .Both with Hacked on & 1880 off
Lexar 1000x 32GB :)

 

krummi

I'm having a hell of a hard time finding a vendor to ship me a 1000x Komputerbay card to Iceland. What kind of success have you guys been getting with 2.35 cropped 1880p footage on slower cards, if any?

reddeercity

Quote from: krummi on June 25, 2013, 03:37:11 AM
I'm having a hell of a hard time finding a vendor to ship me a 1000x Komputerbay card to Iceland. What kind of success have you guys been getting with 2.35 cropped 1880p footage on slower cards, if any?

:) Will i just did a few tests on my slower CF cards as follows:
Scandisk 60MB/s 400x 32 GB = best 1728x736 24p @50.1MB/s (Continuous Recording)
Scandisk 90MB/s 600x 32 GB = best 1880x800 24p @58.9MB/s (Continuous Recording)
Both at 2:35
All with June 24th built, frame over ride on  ;)

ted ramasola

Performance gains with variable buffer and speculative start.
Using Lexar 1000x 32gb on 5d2. Each resolution was tested twice, results separated by ( / ).
Card is always formatted in camera before a new build is tested.
All tests done with: GD=off, preview=hacked, FPS over ride= 23.976

resolutions at 1x -- frames 1st take/2nd take

jun 19 by a.d.

1880 x 1058 -- 319/326
1880 x 1016 -- 532/425
1880 x 940  -- 779/988
1880 x 854  --continuous

alex variable buffer jun 21

1872 x 1054 -- 486/480
1872 x 1012 -- 755/732
1872 x 936  -- 2,391/2,272
1872 x 850  -- continuous
1856 x 1044 -- 521
1856 x 928  -- continuous

jun 22 by a.d. spec start off

1872 x 1054 -- 485/582
1872 x 1012 -- 932/876
1872 x 936  -- 4,085/3,626
1872 x 850  -- continuous
1856 x 1044 -- 644/563
1856 x 928  -- continuous

jun 22 by a.d. spec start ON

1872 x 1054 -- 504/531
1872 x 1012 -- 949/893
1872 x 936  -- 2,833/2,369
1872 x 850  -- continuous
1856 x 1044 -- 572/639
1856 x 928  -- continuous

jun 24 by a.d.

1872 x 1054 -- 572/506
1872 x 1012 -- 871/858
1872 x 936  -- 2,868/4,009
1872 x 850  -- continuous
1856 x 1044 -- 557/555
1856 x 928  -- continuous

CROP modes in the following builds;

jun 18-19-21-24 were all Unpredictable and always have pinkish cast in all frames.
I have the number of frames tabulated but since they're mostly pinkish I didn't bother posting.

last build with no pink cast in most resolutions was Jun 16 by a.d.
5DmkII  / 7D
www.ramasolaproductions.com
Texas

motionpikczer

http://youtu.be/ieTRtKOSDmI

5D mark ii / 2013/06/22 Build
1872 x 936 / Komputerbay 128gb 1000x

:)

a.d.

@ all with random pink frames in crop mode
https://bitbucket.org/a_d_/laboratory/wiki/Home

@ted and duncanidaho25
Beautiful shots of the Moon

@motionpikczer
I like it

Doyle4

@a.d.

in the link theres a download file, is this the 25th build please? or is it something else?

Cheers  :)


UPDATE: yup... working nice :D

dariSSight#1

Quote from: a.d. on June 25, 2013, 10:37:15 AM
@ all with random pink frames in crop mode
https://bitbucket.org/a_d_/laboratory/wiki/Home

@ted and duncanidaho25
Beautiful shots of the Moon

@motionpikczer
I like it


Good Morning a.d,

Thanks for the new hack the pink frames were becoming a journey, I will install and test.

Doyle4

Quote from: dariSSight#1 on June 25, 2013, 11:33:15 AM

Good Morning a.d,

Thanks for the new hack the pink frames were becoming a journey, I will install and test.

It does say in the link btw if you suffer from pink frames to stay away from the build, im not sure if he means the new release or the 24th build, give it a shot :)

dariSSight#1

Quote from: Doyle4 on June 25, 2013, 11:39:58 AM
It does say in the link btw if you suffer from pink frames to stay away from the build, im not sure if he means the new release or the 24th build, give it a shot :)

I think a.d said if you had dead pixel in frames stay away from link, but the link is for a fix for pink frames.

a1ex

I can't reproduce the pink frame issue at all.

Straight from my card: http://a1ex.magiclantern.fm/bleeding-edge/5D2/5d2-fac94f686d23-pink-debug.zip

Write down the black levels (they appear in the top area on the screen, when starting and when stopping recording) and post them, along with the result (whether the recorded frames were pink or not).

Doyle4

Quote from: dariSSight#1 on June 25, 2013, 12:28:11 PM
I think a.d said if you had dead pixel in frames stay away from link, but the link is for a fix for pink frames.

Ahhh right, sorry my miss understanding there, all working great btw :)

I can say i have no prink frames as of yet, but highest resolution i can record on atm is 1472x828 due my cards speed.

Doyle4

Quote from: a1ex on June 25, 2013, 12:33:59 PM
I can't reproduce the pink frame issue at all.

Straight from my card: http://a1ex.magiclantern.fm/bleeding-edge/5D2/5d2-fac94f686d23-pink-debug.zip

Write down the black levels (they appear in the top area on the screen, when starting and when stopping recording) and post them, along with the result (whether the recorded frames were pink or not).

Whats the difference between your fac94f686d23-pink-debug.zip ML A1lex and todays release? Im more than happy to try it or is this for pink frame suffer's again?

Cheers.