Canon 650D [OLD]

Started by nanomad, November 29, 2012, 12:54:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lucas_W

Yes, I was getting that when I was originally trying to get it to work, but I forget what I did. Maybe you need to do the EOScard step when you put the http://nanomad.magiclantern.fm/650D/magiclantern-v2.3.NEXT.2013Feb02.650D.BOOTFIX.zip on in that first step as well as after you replace the files?
Canon EOS 650D + Kit lens, EF 50mm 1.8 and 52mm polariser.

Shadeena

Same thing happened. I guess I better be patient and wait for an official public release before I do something majorly wrong :) thanks anyway

a1ex

QuoteEnableMainFirm

That's for unbricking, not for enabling the boot flag.

Shadeena

That makes sense I guess, have no idea why it's saying so, hmm maybe it's not liking the files and it's enabling the main firmware to avoid damage?

Lucas_W

All I know is I kept getting that until I somehow got the right setup and got ML working.

Ah, that's right. I also adapted my method of getting it working on my camera from the method from installing the pre-alpha that's no-longer available (http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=3697.msg24949#msg24949). Obviously you can't do the dumper part (and I didn't need to). If you (or anyone) wants to continue, you'll have to interpret that and think about what steps to do. I'd be more descriptive, but I'm off to bed now.
Canon EOS 650D + Kit lens, EF 50mm 1.8 and 52mm polariser.

Slasklita

Yeah well it didnt work for me either :(

nanomad

JUST DON'T USE THAT AUTOEXEC OR FIR
It bypasses a critical safety check so it can potentially damage your camera. For real this time
And that FIR is no good, unless you have a screwed up bootflag on your camera
EOS 1100D | EOS 650 (No, I didn't forget the D) | Ye Olde Canon EF Lenses ('87): 50 f/1.8 - 28 f/2.8 - 70-210 f/4 | EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 | Metz 36 AF-5

nanomad

Lucas, can you send the file you gave me on IRC via PM?
EOS 1100D | EOS 650 (No, I didn't forget the D) | Ye Olde Canon EF Lenses ('87): 50 f/1.8 - 28 f/2.8 - 70-210 f/4 | EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 | Metz 36 AF-5

Slasklita

Quote from: nanomad on April 16, 2013, 09:13:09 PM
JUST DON'T USE THAT AUTOEXEC OR FIR
It bypasses a critical safety check so it can potentially damage your camera. For real this time
And that FIR is no good, unless you have a screwed up bootflag on your camera
How does it affect the camera? How do i know if something broke?

nanomad

Good question. If the camera still works correctly it probably didn't damage anything
(Truth be told this check was missing in the pre-alpha too but we may have been lucky)
EOS 1100D | EOS 650 (No, I didn't forget the D) | Ye Olde Canon EF Lenses ('87): 50 f/1.8 - 28 f/2.8 - 70-210 f/4 | EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 | Metz 36 AF-5

StreetShotz

So excited for the release. I often fondle my camera and envision the moments when I will slid that little ML card into her.....this sounds dirty.....but seriously I cant wait!!!

You guys rock!

teecee

i cant wait to see ML in action for canon 650D  ;D

hope it comes with video time lapse

Lucas_W

Well there we go. I guess it is best to wait until the official alpha, though I still don't get how I managed to get it working on my camera.
Canon EOS 650D + Kit lens, EF 50mm 1.8 and 52mm polariser.

markdagraca

Can you uninstall ML if you do not like it and want to go back to the orginal FW or is it now permanent

Lucas_W

Mine works without the card in, and I can boot up without ML running by holding down SET as I turn it on.
Canon EOS 650D + Kit lens, EF 50mm 1.8 and 52mm polariser.

nanomad

You can always remove the bootflag from both the camera (by re-running the fir you used to install ML and turning the dial when asked) or the SD card (by doing a low level format with KEEP ML option turned off)
EOS 1100D | EOS 650 (No, I didn't forget the D) | Ye Olde Canon EF Lenses ('87): 50 f/1.8 - 28 f/2.8 - 70-210 f/4 | EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 | Metz 36 AF-5

jgallant1990

Hate to be this guy, but any idea of a timeframe for stable release?

blade

If you would have read the tread, you would know...  Its done when its done. No time frame, no deadline, no ms project planning.
eos400D :: eos650D  :: Sigma 18-200 :: Canon 100mm macro

Paxman

These threads really need a sticky post (that is unaffected by scrolling) giving the answer to the most frequent question... ::)

Lucas_W

Or plaster this everywhere

http://wiki.magiclantern.fm/faq?&#troll_questions

Or better yet, make it pop-up in a lightbox kind of embedded pop-up thing for non-registered users.
Canon EOS 650D + Kit lens, EF 50mm 1.8 and 52mm polariser.

Phillips321

Quote from: Lucas_W on April 17, 2013, 02:04:49 PM
Or plaster this everywhere

http://wiki.magiclantern.fm/faq?&#troll_questions

Or better yet, make it pop-up in a lightbox kind of embedded pop-up thing for non-registered users.

Or better yet, for people like me who are itching in their pants to get a working version of ML advise that monetary donations will not help but coders/programmer will.

Note to people monitoring this thread: How many people eagerly checked the thread to see if my post was a release???? ;-)

nanomad

Quote from: Phillips321 on April 17, 2013, 03:59:49 PM
Or better yet, for people like me who are itching in their pants to get a working version of ML advise that monetary donations will not help but coders/programmer will.

We are not accepting donations, so that should be clear enough ;)
EOS 1100D | EOS 650 (No, I didn't forget the D) | Ye Olde Canon EF Lenses ('87): 50 f/1.8 - 28 f/2.8 - 70-210 f/4 | EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 | Metz 36 AF-5

oli650d

Hello, why to have no version ml with the functions which do not walk to block  it would allow all to practice and it could wait
Eos m , Eos 70d canon 18-135 STM :canon 50mm f1.8 : tamron  SP 70-300 f4/5.6 VC : SD eye-fi 4Go/Sandisk extreme pro 95mb/s 8Go:flash yongnuo YN565EX / YN560 II: tube extention macro 31;21;13mm : tamron SP 90mm DI f2.8:sigma 17-50 ex f2.8: efm 22mm...70D.111A

Phillips321

Quote from: oli650d on April 17, 2013, 07:04:15 PM
Hello, why to have no version ml with the functions which do not walk to block  it would allow all to practice and it could wait

I think Oli is requesting a version of ML with the buggy parts disabled so that other less buggy areas can be tested(played with).

I presume the extra effort required to do this should just go towards fixing the bugs?

loplo

I think Oli has to use more punctuation marks.