Resolution, Crop Modes and FOV
I ran a few tests to decide which crop mode / resolution I would use for an upcoming project, so I share my results here, in case it may be of use to anyone wondering...
I could not find a proper, affordable test target, so I decided to create one myself. The chart is 23x13 inches (60.96 x 33.02cm) 600 DPI. It can be cropped, but should not be resized, otherwise you'll lose some details. I had it printed at 600 DPI, inkjet, glossy paper at the local print shop. Total $25 and it gets the job done.
You could also print portions of it on a regular sheet of paper. Just set your printer to 600DPI.
Link to the chart: https://bit.ly/3lL7jft
The Videos:
In the first video, I recorded the chart with different lenses at 2.5k, 2.8k and 5k frtp. I then recorded various related real-life scenes to validate what I observed when reviewing the chart recordings.
In the second video, I recorded a football field right from the center at 2.5k, 2.8k and 5k frtp, at different focal lengths, to have a reference for the relationship between Focal Length, Crop Mode and FOV.
Link to the Resolution Video: https://bit.ly/3ajK6hL
Link to the FOV Video: https://bit.ly/38LQ2jn
Link to the MLV files for the resolution tests with the efm 32mm Lens: https://bit.ly/3LVaGea
(I did not include every lens tested because of space restrictions)
You have to download the videos in order to view at full Prores 422 resolution.
What to pay attention to when looking at the chart:
A: When looking at those patterns, you can see the size of details at which the camera starts creating moiré and other artifacts.
B: The various wheels help exposing any aliasing.
C: The text at various sizes, along with the various patterns, help with the evaluation sharpness.
D: The checkerboard patterns also help at observing moiré, and artifact created when recording repetitive patterns of different sizes. The sharp contrast between blocks will also expose aberrations or high contrast related artifacts, if present.
The Resolution Test
In order to facilitate comparison, I resized the 2.8K and 5K to 2520x1054 (2.5k) in the video. Downscaling the Pixel-Binned 5k has a serious advantage: A significantly sharper image. When using DaVinci Resolve or Topaz Video Enhance AI to upscale, sharpness and most details are preserved, so you will end up with a sharper image than if you left the 5k image as-is.
Also to facilitate comparison, I moved the camera closer to or further away from the target to get the same chart framing, regardless of the recording resolution / crop mode.
As expected, the 2.5k and 2.8k recordings are quite clean, with moiré present only at the smallest detail levels.There are focus dots "Trapped" between the narrowest-spaced lines. Changing the interpolation method in "Fix Focus Dots" in MLV App helps, but will not get rid of all of those. The interpolation method 3 gave the best results.
At 5k, some aliasing is present when recording steep oblique lines, but luckily, the artifacts are not as obvious (if at all) when recording real-life targets (See second portion of the Video).
The FOV Test
For this test, the camera was put right at the center of the football field. Only the focal length was modified on the ef-m 15-45mm lens. As you can see (In the video) crop modes have a serious impact on the FOV (Field-of-view). Also, by looking at the net in the goal, you can evaluate when the Focal length / detail size is large enough to avoid moiré when filming repetitive-detailed objects (Nets, fences, hair, fur, screens, rooftop tiles, etc.)
Why is 5k frtp so important?
There is very little difference between 2.8k and 2.5k. You can, for the most part, compensate by moving a few steps closer or away from the subject. The price to pay for the extra pixels in 2.8k is a less fluid recording experience and shorter recording times.
5k frtp gives not only a wider field of view, but also a significantly different perspective when compared to a similar 2.8k or 2.5k framing. frtp allows real-time previews (As opposed to the framing of 2.8k and 2.5k) and downscaling 5k to 2.5k for editing makes the noise finer, less obtrusive and quite pleasing.
The mode has issues with steep, contrasty oblique lines, but moiré has a different quality, far less obvious than in the other modes.
As a rule of thumb, avoiding fine details in the frame, getting as close as possible to the subject and avoiding extra-wide lenses will allow you to get around most problems. If shooting a scene with a lot of steep obliques, using 2.8k or 2.5k would be a good idea. It would also be good to favor lower contrast, less sharp lenses (But keep in mind that Vintage sharpness still has clarity, which is definitely not the case when looking at the softness of the ef-m 15-45mm at some focal lengths and apertures, as you can see in the video)
I do not own the proper adapters to fit older glass on my ef-m, but it would be interesting to compare different lenses to the well known ef-m lenses in such a controlled fashion, for reference.
And the Focus Dots?
When using manual focus, is there a way to forbid the camera to generate those completely? It would help a lot when shooting naked product or things like fences and lace.
Reference for Beginners:
https://martinbaileyphotography.com/2017/04/10/the-effect-of-subject-distance-and-focal-length-on-perspective-podcast-568/
I ran a few tests to decide which crop mode / resolution I would use for an upcoming project, so I share my results here, in case it may be of use to anyone wondering...
I could not find a proper, affordable test target, so I decided to create one myself. The chart is 23x13 inches (60.96 x 33.02cm) 600 DPI. It can be cropped, but should not be resized, otherwise you'll lose some details. I had it printed at 600 DPI, inkjet, glossy paper at the local print shop. Total $25 and it gets the job done.
You could also print portions of it on a regular sheet of paper. Just set your printer to 600DPI.
Link to the chart: https://bit.ly/3lL7jft
The Videos:
In the first video, I recorded the chart with different lenses at 2.5k, 2.8k and 5k frtp. I then recorded various related real-life scenes to validate what I observed when reviewing the chart recordings.
In the second video, I recorded a football field right from the center at 2.5k, 2.8k and 5k frtp, at different focal lengths, to have a reference for the relationship between Focal Length, Crop Mode and FOV.
Link to the Resolution Video: https://bit.ly/3ajK6hL
Link to the FOV Video: https://bit.ly/38LQ2jn
Link to the MLV files for the resolution tests with the efm 32mm Lens: https://bit.ly/3LVaGea
(I did not include every lens tested because of space restrictions)
You have to download the videos in order to view at full Prores 422 resolution.
What to pay attention to when looking at the chart:
A: When looking at those patterns, you can see the size of details at which the camera starts creating moiré and other artifacts.
B: The various wheels help exposing any aliasing.
C: The text at various sizes, along with the various patterns, help with the evaluation sharpness.
D: The checkerboard patterns also help at observing moiré, and artifact created when recording repetitive patterns of different sizes. The sharp contrast between blocks will also expose aberrations or high contrast related artifacts, if present.
The Resolution Test
In order to facilitate comparison, I resized the 2.8K and 5K to 2520x1054 (2.5k) in the video. Downscaling the Pixel-Binned 5k has a serious advantage: A significantly sharper image. When using DaVinci Resolve or Topaz Video Enhance AI to upscale, sharpness and most details are preserved, so you will end up with a sharper image than if you left the 5k image as-is.
Also to facilitate comparison, I moved the camera closer to or further away from the target to get the same chart framing, regardless of the recording resolution / crop mode.
As expected, the 2.5k and 2.8k recordings are quite clean, with moiré present only at the smallest detail levels.There are focus dots "Trapped" between the narrowest-spaced lines. Changing the interpolation method in "Fix Focus Dots" in MLV App helps, but will not get rid of all of those. The interpolation method 3 gave the best results.
At 5k, some aliasing is present when recording steep oblique lines, but luckily, the artifacts are not as obvious (if at all) when recording real-life targets (See second portion of the Video).
The FOV Test
For this test, the camera was put right at the center of the football field. Only the focal length was modified on the ef-m 15-45mm lens. As you can see (In the video) crop modes have a serious impact on the FOV (Field-of-view). Also, by looking at the net in the goal, you can evaluate when the Focal length / detail size is large enough to avoid moiré when filming repetitive-detailed objects (Nets, fences, hair, fur, screens, rooftop tiles, etc.)
Why is 5k frtp so important?
There is very little difference between 2.8k and 2.5k. You can, for the most part, compensate by moving a few steps closer or away from the subject. The price to pay for the extra pixels in 2.8k is a less fluid recording experience and shorter recording times.
5k frtp gives not only a wider field of view, but also a significantly different perspective when compared to a similar 2.8k or 2.5k framing. frtp allows real-time previews (As opposed to the framing of 2.8k and 2.5k) and downscaling 5k to 2.5k for editing makes the noise finer, less obtrusive and quite pleasing.
The mode has issues with steep, contrasty oblique lines, but moiré has a different quality, far less obvious than in the other modes.
As a rule of thumb, avoiding fine details in the frame, getting as close as possible to the subject and avoiding extra-wide lenses will allow you to get around most problems. If shooting a scene with a lot of steep obliques, using 2.8k or 2.5k would be a good idea. It would also be good to favor lower contrast, less sharp lenses (But keep in mind that Vintage sharpness still has clarity, which is definitely not the case when looking at the softness of the ef-m 15-45mm at some focal lengths and apertures, as you can see in the video)
I do not own the proper adapters to fit older glass on my ef-m, but it would be interesting to compare different lenses to the well known ef-m lenses in such a controlled fashion, for reference.
And the Focus Dots?
When using manual focus, is there a way to forbid the camera to generate those completely? It would help a lot when shooting naked product or things like fences and lace.
Reference for Beginners:
https://martinbaileyphotography.com/2017/04/10/the-effect-of-subject-distance-and-focal-length-on-perspective-podcast-568/