That's the beauty of having a lens with a short minimum focus distance. The further an object is away from the lens, the larger the depth of field gets.
That's why macro lenses seem "slow" in comparison but because you can get closer than any "normal" lens you get all the bokeh you want.
The great thing about 35mm macro is that you avoid the wide angle distortion while the macro allows for separation.
This is probably my favorite FD zoom lens. Best combo so far is Canon FD 24mm f2 + the 35-105mm Macro. Only challenge is with the EOS M, i need to make sure there's plenty of lighting.
I'm very curious to try this combo on a Sigma FP (gotta go rent one). Most cameras will maintain data in the seemingly blown out highlights when it comes to raw. Sigma FP took an opposite approach where it's advised to underexpose to ensure the highlights aren't blown out while being able to recover the shadows. (Some testing for another time and place.)
That's why macro lenses seem "slow" in comparison but because you can get closer than any "normal" lens you get all the bokeh you want.
The great thing about 35mm macro is that you avoid the wide angle distortion while the macro allows for separation.
This is probably my favorite FD zoom lens. Best combo so far is Canon FD 24mm f2 + the 35-105mm Macro. Only challenge is with the EOS M, i need to make sure there's plenty of lighting.
I'm very curious to try this combo on a Sigma FP (gotta go rent one). Most cameras will maintain data in the seemingly blown out highlights when it comes to raw. Sigma FP took an opposite approach where it's advised to underexpose to ensure the highlights aren't blown out while being able to recover the shadows. (Some testing for another time and place.)