Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - togg

#376
Quote from: Redrocks on July 17, 2013, 10:11:04 AM

1) transfer .RAW
2) debayer
3) import to Resolve and export proxies
4) import proxies to PP, edit and export XML
5) import XML to Resolve and decide what can be done there / need ACR
6) dynamic link from PP to AE and render out lossless for Resolve / dynamic link for PP

This should be the best one.
#377
Quote from: a1ex on July 16, 2013, 06:36:37 PM
The mystery should clear up now.

Announced here: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=7139

Now we are talking :D I want to read the pdf to understand how all of that was possible.
#378
Impressive. For real.
#379
Quote from: duncanidaho25 on July 15, 2013, 09:59:33 PM
chroma denoiser is that not available in the lite version?

If I remember correct there was a workaround.
#380
Quote from: a1ex on July 14, 2013, 02:04:50 PM
No, just one.

I'm not sure I've got it. You have found/invented something that increase the DR of a single photo?
#381
If I've understood it right you have to remove the noise only at the end. Because if you do it before and than you color grade you will create some artifacts.
#382
Quote from: Mei Lewis on July 14, 2013, 11:03:07 PM
What's the update mechanism for Resolve? I have 9.1.3 but can't find an update menu option.

Thanks.

You have to redownload it from their site.
#383
Quote from: Doyle4 on July 06, 2013, 10:13:00 PM
Not sure what im doing wrong, but im on a mac and have a split file, for over an hour now i have tried everything to join, but not getting anywhere :(

Iv tried dragging the folder into terminal and using the command, nothing
tried dragging in the 2 files, then the command, nothing :(
Terminal keeps telling me theres no directory, how do i tell it where the files are etc?

Cheers

You're doing something wrong. Be sure to copy/paste the directory also for the output file and check all the spaces etc.
#384
Quote from: ch_d on July 02, 2013, 06:26:11 PM
i can´t get more than 64,8mb/s with my komputerbay 1000x udma7 128gb card.
GD off. Small hacks on. ect.

I will receive my 32gb komputerbay in the next days (*FINALLY*), I'll let you know.
#385
Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: Davinci Resolve Lite
July 02, 2013, 07:06:46 PM
Quote from: marekk on July 02, 2013, 04:26:01 PM
raw2dng doesn't remove bad pixels, only adds badpixel_opcode to dng header. ACR removes bad pixels based on badpixel_opcode.

thanks for the info.
anyway I've tried again at 1600 ISO and now I see only one red pixel mmm
#386
Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: Davinci Resolve Lite
July 01, 2013, 02:28:44 AM
Quote from: chmee on July 01, 2013, 12:07:57 AM
for first tests no restrictions - to be universal, it should be the biggest resolution the body can handle. (!) to simplify the thing, it would be good to record against black, for example with lens cover on.

The Idea is simple - taking this first frame, analyzing on "same value" sensels, they seem to be bad/hot. destination:

(A) writing badpixel-opcode in the tiff-header (and i dont know, if resolve can handle this opcode).
or
(B) writing a synthetic node for resolve with masked points.. saving in the according path.

This Data would be kind of footprint, unique for every body. It would be generated once and could be used for every footage made on this body, because these pixels "should" be static. thats the idea..

regards chmee

This would be wonderful. 

Maximum resolution for 5D II, 6400 ISO, lens cap on.

http://www.mediafire.com/?fndd6lya251so8z

Using Resolve I've found 10 (TEN!) bad pixel  :'( I hope this will help you, http://i.imgur.com/Ktc2wcD.jpg
#387
Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: Davinci Resolve Lite
June 30, 2013, 09:48:19 PM
Quote from: DerekDock on June 27, 2013, 12:24:42 AM
Resolve really is awesome for post processing. If only it could remove my hot pixels...

So true :(
#388
Raw Video / Re: 5D3 Raw 4:2:2 or 4:4:4?
June 29, 2013, 01:45:11 AM
Quote from: vroem on June 29, 2013, 12:12:51 AM
- 5D3 probably uses all pixel information in its downscaling (unlike line skipping which typically uses one pixel out of nine)
- Its downscaling is better than line skipping: less moiré and aliasing artifacts

strange stuff :))
#389
Great idea the manual LCD  :o
#390
The new buffer graphic is really beautiful.
#391
Quote from: ted ramasola on June 21, 2013, 04:46:33 PM
if you use the beep feature for sync. I've done some tests with it syncing dialog and here's some info to help.

Set the camera speaker volume to 5 or highest so the beep is audible to the sound recorder.

In a 24P framerate the beep's peak is consistently of the 5th frame of video recording. There might be a slight fade in slope on the 4th frame but otherwise the peak begins on the 5th.

Thanks. Trilled to test the new build.
#392
a.d. & pravdomil's 5D2 builds / Re: 4:3
June 18, 2013, 04:19:11 PM
Quote from: mymadness on June 18, 2013, 02:21:47 PM
I'm awaiting delivery on a CF card that will give me enough speed to test this all out for myself, but I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on shooting 4:3

Is it possible on the MkII? What are the resolutions you can do it at and how many frames will you get?

Yes, no problem. With my slow card I can get 1280X960 continuous. 49,1 MB/s. But with a 1000X CF you will be able to get 1472X1104 (65 MB/s).

So! I'm trying the latest build and finally I've realized that the only preview that EVER worked for me is the Canon one. I'm not able to use ML Grayscale or HaCKed.

edit: ok, now it seems that 5X and 10X are always grayscaled.
#393
Quote from: a1ex on June 17, 2013, 03:00:39 PM
Did it work before?!

I don't remember until it works. But it is a couple of builds that I'm having problems. It's only today that I've figured out that it is the force left option.
#394
In the last release force left corrupt everything. Am I the only one?
#395
With the latest build everything is corrupted :(
#396
Quote from: avasarin on June 14, 2013, 04:34:35 PM
Of course. It gives you the freedom to shoot wherever you want. The only cons I see is the minimal focus shifting and the bad performance with zoom, because it didn't hold the focus while zooming. But This cons are microscopic against moiré and aliasing.
Thanks. I'll wait until I'll be able to afford it :)
#397
Quote from: avasarin on June 14, 2013, 01:40:43 PM
I don't see any noticeable artifact or moire/aliasing problem(I use the VAF-5D2 filter btw).


So in your opinion is it worth the price?
#398
Quote from: xNiNELiVES on June 10, 2013, 07:17:11 AM
Whats you're workflow for blowup? I can't seem to find a way to easily batch process all these images. I don't want to import to lightroom.

Same things here. Blowup plugin refuse to open "smart objects" :/
#399
Raw Video / Re: Get rid of hot/stuck/... pixels
June 11, 2013, 08:48:45 PM
Quote from: ch_d on June 11, 2013, 06:29:20 PM
And i still have this wired green dots on my pictures:


even with the latest builds from 10.06.2013
you can use pencil correction on ACR. so there's no problem.
#400
Raw Video / Re: Get rid of hot/stuck/... pixels
June 11, 2013, 06:17:20 PM
Quote from: ch_d on June 11, 2013, 03:32:58 PM
Hello.
Can anybody tell me how to remove hot / stuck / ... pixels with ACR (adobe camera raw) from our DNGs for video!?

Thank you

ACR should have a little bit of color noise correction by default.  hot pixel is not a problem.