The SD-Controller in the mkIII is Limited to 20Mb/s, so... There is no readon for such adapters
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: hirethestache on June 10, 2013, 11:11:21 PM
Give me three weeks and you will all be very happy people
Quote from: akiesels on June 08, 2013, 11:04:38 PM
Hey guys,
I think there is a much simpler solution to do this with off-the-shelf parts.
There is a CF to IDE adapter manufactured by Fabia Tech in Taiwan that basically exposes a standard 40 pin IDE connector at the end of a "dummy" CF card:
http://www.rcpcomputer.com/automation/FA/CF%20Adapter%20Boards/IDE%20to%20CF/FB4658.pdf
It seems to be rebranded by ES&S Cable in Europe:
http://www.esskabel.de/upload/files/pdf/ADA-COMPACTFLASH-ATA-IDE40_DE.pdf
but I haven't found any US resellers.
You can then use a standard 40 pin cable to connect it to this SATA device to IDE host controller adapter manufactured by Lycom:
http://www.lycom.com.tw/ST106-2.htm
It's rebranded by Rosewill in the US:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812119257
And seems to be also available from ES&S Cable in Europe:
http://www.esskabel.de/adapter/datasheet/ada-sata-ii-ide40-ly/1
The spec says it supports ATA UDMA mode up to 150MB/s. The SATA side will not be a problem, as it's much much faster.
You should then be able to use any SATA SSD drive, though you'll need to supply external power to it.
I am not sure how much the CF-IDE adapter costs, but it seems to be all passive electronics - just a wire mapping. So, I can't imagine it being too pricey. So, without the SSD and the power supply, I am guessing it's less than $50 to try out.
Hope this helps!
Alexander
Quote from: hirethestache on June 08, 2013, 07:26:56 PM
Why look into an IDE interface, with a maximum transfer speed of 163mb/s?
Quote from: kgv5 on June 07, 2013, 11:39:08 AM
BMCC4k has super 35 sensor, not FF
Quote from: aaphotog on June 06, 2013, 09:10:48 PM
I personally don't own a BMC, I do own a 5d3. So as it stands, the BMCC would be a few thousand more.
The BMCC also doesn't take photos, my 5D3 does.
The BMCC does NOT have a full frame sensor my 5d3 does. I'm just saying
Quote from: Michael Zöller on June 05, 2013, 12:12:27 PM
Pete, can you please post some pictures and benchmarks? Thanks!
Quote from: PeteTomov on June 05, 2013, 11:06:24 AM
I hadn't seen your design. Looks pretty cool.
We're going for a slightly different approach with a smaller all-in-one box with removable batteries
Page created in 0.100 seconds with 13 queries.