Messages

Cool, good work on the comparison. What lens? Raw crushes cinestyle...

Oh and use the "[youtube]" code to embed please.

So is elapsed time possible for raw rec display or would that require the whole module to be re-done?

1088x480, over 2500 frames. Checking now for corrupt frames, didn't see any in playback though. This is a good go-to aspect, height and width is balanced nicely.

I may have missed it, but is there any way to add elapsed time to the raw display, maybe even in place of the frame count? Even if it only updated every 5-10 seconds would be helpful.

No problemo

[Magic]

If that ever happens, together with you will be happy to support the project on Kickstarter.
Simply...

Magic Camera

Easy on the huge font, please.

Considering most of the devs live in different countries, it would be an extremely difficult undertaking.

Remove s from https:// to embed properly

Nice work! Did you experience many bugs or problems with audio sync with the 600D? I'll be shooting a raw music video next week, my biggest concern is lining up the audio properly in post.

And those skin tones are so much better than h264. Raw has spoiled us lol

"Are the corrupt frames on every raw video you shoot? I still get corrupt frames but only on the first raw video I shoot after start-up."

I don't believe we should think this way. A reliable system must record correctly since the first shoot and no failures, never.

And there is no time to keep watching every shoot in the set.

Imagine the situation you are paying two actors and one crew assistant for a day work (a minimum situation)... plus transport and food... how many money will you loose if you get magenta frames in an important shoot? for a low budget project, failures must be avoided!

And what about a wedding? there is no replay in a wedding...

The RAW video in Canon DSLR is promissing, but at this moment it is just a toy... We are in early Canon raw days... I believe the developers will find a way to make it reliable enough for serious production,

Trust me, I know all about reliability. My point was, they need specifics about bugs to address them properly. Its hard to tell if raw rec will ever be reliable for paid work, especially on our sd-only cameras.

Not to mention, we get what we pay for 

Are the corrupt frames on every raw video you shoot? I still get corrupt frames but only on the first raw video I shoot after start-up.

- additional-crop-rectangle is not in the middle of the screen and I cannot crop correctly. http://youtu.be/I9foDKlUckw
- RAW preview with monitor attached hangs up the camera. Need to remove battery.

Change the crop box by turning on panning mode in raw menu and adjust it accordingly.

Not sure about raw preview, sounds like a bug though.

I shoot Raw with my 8/16 GB SanDisk Ultra 30MB/s...
Nothing more than 3 seconds still at 960*540...
Doing the ML test and results that it write at 8MB/s...
How it's possible?

Could be an old card, misadvertised, or your settings may be wrong.

I've updated the first post to include info on cards. I'd say just buy the fastest thing you can possibly find lol, since newer cameras now support UHS speeds.

Try lower aspects. 1120x462 is max continuous for me, or 960x540 works well too.

Turn off hack3d mode lol

1%, how about hack3d mode being off on startup, or labeled like-

Hack3d (LV freeze)

Yeah exactly, I think the first consumer camera company to offer this is going to profit tremendously. Buy a single, affordable camera body and them have different packages for timelapsers, videographers, wedding photographers, even paparazzi lol...

hello! I wonder if with a SD 120 mb / s would to improve the resolution of raw video for greater qulidade possible?

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005025ZXK

Whoa, never seen thise before. But no, sd card controller in the cameras is limited to ~21MB/s. Sandisk makes a 95 MB/s card for way cheaper anyway with great build quality. Maybe in a year or two...

Crazy thought.

A company like Canon offers a large number of camera models with different bodies, features, etc. It's clear that these cameras are capable of so much more in light of the recent accomplishments of the ML team. So why not let consumers decide which capabilities they'd prefer through downloads that offer different sets of features?

We already have this idea implented successfully in video games and other forms of entertainment. So why not offer it on higher priced electronics, especially cameras? The firmware "upgrades" are free, sure; but what if we wanted something more specific? It would work the same way as the upgrades but would let us customize our cameras exactly how we wanted them. Also, companies would continue to profit from camera models for years after whenever they released new features for particular models.

Or maybe I'm just ahead of my time. Who knows.

Can we just completely get rid of the stock firmware or modes and have a ML build to run everything from?

Hey, a guy can dream, can't he?

Try sending him a pm about it, if he doesn't log on here anymore he might get an email

Imax cameras only hold 3 minutes of 70mm film and take ~20 minutes to unload, so it could be worse 

Format your card to exfat, then make it bootable with eoscard or macboot (or re-install ML normally). Put the nightly back onto the card and copy/paste whats in tragic lantern 2.0 to the card. Modules folder goes in ML folder

Yup, perfect! The show looks pretty interesting btw

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=5494.0

Check the first post

550D topic-

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=5582.0

Use the youtube button to embed it or else we won't watch it 

Yup, mono mic=one channel