I have a question: do you set the BV yourself or does the module do that for you? I have no idea how to compile ML, so I can't try it
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: andyshon on July 24, 2013, 02:01:01 PMYour photography isn't crappy
Not knowing how the algorithm works setting -4EV to get essentially unity makes no sense to me. And could it be adjustable in finer increments, half or third stops?
Quote from: andyshon on July 24, 2013, 02:01:01 PMYes we do indeed need a utility to offset exposure gain in post. I asked that a while back and the devs said you could write a script to offset the expo comp values in the sidecar files, but I don't know how to do that. I did also ask for help on writing a script to do that but got no reply.
A utility that allowed you to offset exposure gain in post, whilst maintaining deflicker, would be very handy. Does anyone know of a way to do this?
Quote from: daancalo2013 on July 23, 2013, 09:07:16 PMI'm not going to make a video tutorial because I don't feel it's needed, plus I don't have a 5D3.
hello I have a 5d mark 3 and want to know how do I install dual iso, video tutorial please.
Quote from: mk11174 on July 23, 2013, 02:49:05 AMI don't know, but your post does not seem to help him very much. It might be your English but what I got from your post is that after zooming to 50mm, zoom out to a wider focal length to regain focus. However there is a problem with this: the purpose of zooming in to 50mm is to shoot at 50mm, not something else. This might not be what you meant; if it isn't, then I'm sorry for the misunderstanding.
I don't see why it matters, I am just trying to be helpful, I really don't see why you have to point out it might not be relevant, can't people just help people without all this attitude, I don't see why it always comes to this in these boards!
Quote from: mk11174 on July 22, 2013, 11:17:31 PMI don't see how your post is relevant to his question. He has a problem where the lens does not retain focus after zooming; some lenses have this problem. He wants some sort of feature that re-focuses after zoom to the same focus distance as before the zoom.
Maybe your lens is like mine, mine is the kit lens, try focusing first of coarse, switch to MF and the big thing that is a bug in my lens is any time you turn lens in the zoom direction, when you zoom to the point you want, just always nudge back in the wide direction, that will give you your focus back. On my other lens I dont have this issue, once you focus, if you zoom in and out it dont get messed up. But this kit lens is kinda flimsy it seems. So my rule is always nudge back to wide any time I zoom.
Quote from: Walter Schulz on July 19, 2013, 09:53:00 AMThat works fine in Windows, I'm not sure about whether you can just use it like that if you have to run it using wine.
Copy your RAW video file to a location you like. For you it will do in Z:\Users\Seba\Desktop\Raw\ and drag and drop this file onto raw2dng_shadow050.exe. After this step you will get a bunch of files in this very folder/directory for further processing.
Ciao, Walter
Quotewine ./raw2dng_shadow050.exe file.raw
Quote from: jkdjedi on July 19, 2013, 03:30:04 AMYou'll either have to compile yourself, or wait for someone to release the updated autoexec.bin for 7D. You'll need both the dual_iso modules and the autoexec.bin
Sorry if I missed it...but....Is there a noob guide on how to implement this hack on the 7d? My guess is that you'll need the original Magic Lantern firmware and just copy and paste to some bin files.. I know, I know...we're not worthy..but please, point us in the right direction..Thank You.
Quote from: scurrvy2020 on July 18, 2013, 02:22:45 PMHere: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzFGDdZw7pVwUnFKVjZoQXE4WVU/edit?usp=sharing
Is anyone mirroring the automatic color grading script? I'm not able to download it because drop box has stopped the link.
Quote from: bogdan_XXI on July 17, 2013, 06:34:06 PMFirst of all, the 18-55 is not a classical mediocrity. It's decent, apart from the fact that the aperture range may not be ideal.
Cheers to all of you
I have a proposition in relation to a project of mine...
Have a Canon 550D, very happy about it. I wanted a replacement for the clasical mediocrity Canon 18-55 and went for a Sigma 18-50 2.8-4.5. The lens is some expensive for a standard one, about 200 euros so.. after some researching, i decided to buy a new 18-50 for the SA mount and convert it to EF.
Swapping the mount and connectors was easy job but i didn't expect it to have software differencies, sigma and canon protocols are identical, conectors identical.. practicaly is the same lens with different mount or .. this is what i thought
All works except for
- optical stabilisation with behaves strange - it doesn't want to switch off, and ii start and stops even if i do not take pictures and just for example viewing the menu. Also, it depleted half the battery in 20 pics
- when focusing it sounds louder than usual like its beeing slightly forced into action
Maybe is more to it but doesn't show yet
My conclusion is that i need the firmware replaced with one from a 18-50 ef mount .. probably forced replace
Awaiting your opinions on the topic
BTW The subject of lens customisation is just getting hot, check this out
http://petapixel.com/2013/06/10/testing-out-sigmas-lens-calibration-usb-dock-and-software/
Quote from: Dns on July 17, 2013, 11:44:45 AMI'm by no means an expert on this, so take my words with a pinch of salt (or a tablespoon for that matter)
No hope for poor people like me(550D)? Finger Crossed
Quote from: togg on July 16, 2013, 12:14:16 AMThe DR is there, he just found a good way to squeeze all of it out of the image. I don't think you can "increase the DR of a single photo"; what's captured in a raw photo is stored in the raw photo, you just need to be able to bring it out.
I'm not sure I've got it. You have found/invented something that increase the DR of a single photo?
Quote from: a1ex on July 15, 2013, 10:07:37 AMI doubt setting the thresholds to extreme values will help, especially in something like a sunrise/sunset/day to night time lapse. If you set highlight level to the max (65k or something), for the dark photos in the whole sequence, the script will try to push the highlights up, causing what is supposed to be a dark sky to appear bright.
Cool.
For timelapse, this script may not be ideal; you probably want the same settings on all files, rather than analyzing every single image and deciding how many exposures it needs.
If you disable highlight/shadow recovery (e.g. by setting the thresholds to extreme values), you should get similar results as with ML post deflicker. Maybe slightly less accurate because of downsampling.
Quote# from 0 to 65535The values there can't be 0. Using 0 as the shadow level results in a divide by 0 error
highlight_level = 50000
midtone_level = 10000
shadow_level = 1000
Quote from: a1ex on July 15, 2013, 09:53:52 AMOk, setting the output file to png works. Thanks!
Here, imagemagick says:
convert: Sorry, there are legal restrictions on arithmetic coding `00000001.jpg' @ error/jpeg.c/EmitMessage/235.
So... try to output a png or tiff or something:
j = os.path.join(out_dir, change_ext(f, ".tif"))
Quoteenfuse: info: input image "00000001-h0.jpg" does not have an alpha channel;
enfuse: info: assuming all pixels should contribute to the final image
enfuse: info: input image "00000001-h1.jpg" does not have an alpha channel;
enfuse: info: assuming all pixels should contribute to the final image
enfuse: info: input image "00000001-m.jpg" does not have an alpha channel;
enfuse: info: assuming all pixels should contribute to the final image
enfuse: info: input image "00000001-s0.jpg" does not have an alpha channel;
enfuse: info: assuming all pixels should contribute to the final image
enfuse: info: input image "00000001-s1.jpg" does not have an alpha channel;
enfuse: info: assuming all pixels should contribute to the final image
enfuse: warning: no usable resolution found in first image "00000001-h0.jpg";
enfuse: warning: will use 300 dpi
enfuse: info: loading next image: 00000001-h0.jpg 1/1
enfuse: info: loading next image: 00000001-h1.jpg 1/1
enfuse: info: loading next image: 00000001-m.jpg 1/1
enfuse: info: loading next image: 00000001-s0.jpg 1/1
enfuse: info: loading next image: 00000001-s1.jpg 1/1
Quote from: Erik Krause on July 14, 2013, 02:54:21 PMHmm really? I've tried turning the dials with the camera in P mode and I see the exposure changing sometimes, and sometimes it does nothing, so I pretty much gave up on P mode. Aperture Priority and Manual mode worked pretty well for me, so I didn't really spend a lot of time figuring out how P mode worked.
Wasn't this ever possible on EOS cameras? In P mode if I use the main dial I can change aperture and time changes accordingly to maintain the same exposure. I can change exposure by turning the back dial.
QuoteAbout Program Shift
In the Program AE mode, you can freely change the shutter speed and
aperture combination (Program) set automatically by the camera while
maintaining the same exposure. This is called Program shift.
QuoteHyper-Program mode
By day, this is a conventional program mode that selects aperture and shutter-speed combinations based on the program-line you've told the camera to use. But with a turn of either of the dials, it transforms itself into 'Hyper-program' mode. The two dials allow you to set the shutter speed or aperture, effectively putting the camera into Tv or AV mode. A quick press of the green button and the camera reverts to its usual, unassuming program mode.
Quote from: gerk.raisen on July 05, 2013, 02:51:44 PMYup, I meant that I installed that build and replaced the raw_rec.mo with the one dhilung made (of course I copied in the raw_rec.c as well). It works that way, at least for the intervals I tested (1s, 4s). Was just a quick test to see if anything changed.
@brapodam
I've just tested the exact build you write and the "Skipping interval" entry doesn't appear.
That build is compiled "vanilla" without external patches applied I think.
Only the "Frame skipping" entry are present (because it is in the standard ML code and isn't part of a patch)
Quote from: gerk.raisen on July 05, 2013, 02:17:29 PMI've tried it on a very recent build (ML-RAW-60D-hourly_2013-07-04_00-00.zip) and the mod works.
@dhilung
Yes, I'm in Movie mode (also because on last versions RAW Video can only work in movie mode)
I tried enable it to 2 or 4 second and than pressed liveview button to star recording
Have you tried your patch also on last committs? Maybe one of the last changes broken it...
(FPS override disabled, just to be sure)
Frame skipping disabled (it's correct, isn't it?)
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 14 queries.