Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - lourenco

#51
Quote from: 1% on May 13, 2013, 04:20:17 PM
Means the memory wasn't freed when camera turned off.

This should be the latest one from last night that reports frame drops. It should work better too. let me know.
  https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7QlH_BH2m32dWpOOEpkWktXMXM/edit?usp=sharing
#52
I will share a newer compiled version soon for the 5D3.
#53
QuoteI'm wondering why there is one or two exposure changes when the car pulls out? This was not done full manual? Or there is a setting on auto?

I am editing the dng files in lightroom.  I am manually changing the exposure in post. The camera exposure setting F stop, shuttor speed, and ISO never changed.

Quoteedit- I see the background trees sharpen a bit when exposure changes so I assume IRIS was on auto?
The focus distance on the lense was changing when the Mustang was reversing. Given one person operating the camera and other person driving the Mustang.
#54
This is with more highlight and shadow recovery.
#55
Quote from: g3gg0 on May 13, 2013, 01:32:13 PM
can you post the exact make/name/model of your CF card in the other thread?
perhaps with a photo of the card?
I think it is the same card as yours? Lexar CF 1000X 32GB.
#57
Quote from: ted ramasola on May 13, 2013, 04:50:21 AM
wow... just wow. So raw recording can record now sound? Is it 44khz or 48khz?

I added in at post. I used my H4N to record the sound externally.

I am wondering if we could try recording a wav file to the SD card while recording raw video to the CF card. I am wondering what would happen.
#58
Full 1080P test at 24fps.  This time with audio.



vs
I-frame 1080p at 24fps.
Technicolor CineStyle


The camera exposure was the same for both videos.
#59
I did 1080P video with audio this time. I am going to post it up.
#60
Quote from: squig on May 12, 2013, 04:50:21 AM
So is 1280x720 60p RAW now doable too? Or 48p?

Raw mode 1280x672 at 48P is possible. 
#61
Quote from: a1ex on May 12, 2013, 03:34:49 PM
1920x1080 RAW video now requires 83MB/s at 24fps, so it should work just fine on 1000x cards. I didn't try it.

It works! This with my Lexar CF 1000X 32GB.
#62
Quote from: squig on May 12, 2013, 03:25:25 AM
Cool! Have you tried filling up the card and if so does the MK3 start to smoke?

I did a test to see what would happen if I filled the memory card. It records the first file fine.  It keeps recording until the memory card is full, but I am having strange results after the first file. I just sent a1ex a message about it. 
#63
Quote from: squig on May 12, 2013, 02:52:59 AM
What's the file size of each 1928x850 DNG frame?
It is about 3.08MB. I have since deleted those files. My youtube video has 1928x820 frames, which is closer to the accepted 2.35:1 aspect ratio. The file size is 2.98MB for those.
#64
Quote from: ted ramasola on May 12, 2013, 02:31:08 AM
If those 2 videos have the same lens settings... that is a wow in terms of detail!

Is 12 sec the max right now at the current build?

At that aspect ratio I can record continuous at 24fps. It helps to have a 5d Mark III with Lexar CF 1000x 32GB card. DNG files take awhile to process on my computer in AE. Yes, the settings were the same. when I was recording i-frame, I used Technicolor CineStyle.
#65
Raw video test 12 seconds 2.35:1 aspect ratio

vs
standard i-frame
#66
Quote from: 1% on May 11, 2013, 08:38:50 PM
Its a single file, lv_rec is latest one. For some reason footers aren't being written/read for single files
I also having the same problem just tried individual frames and single file for yuv 422 and both do not have any footer information on the latest lv_rec.
#67
Quote from: kgv5 on May 11, 2013, 07:14:18 PM
Did you make it for windows? Could you share your compilation with the rest? Thanks

It is just for Linux for now. This would be a good project for mindogas given he already has the 422 converter for Windows.
#68
Quote from: 1% on May 11, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
Worked on a raw movie but for 5d3, right?
Yes.
#69
Quote from: a1ex on May 11, 2013, 02:50:50 PM
Just added a RAW to DNG converter: https://bitbucket.org/hudson/magic-lantern/commits/5bc3488c7a78

Cool. I compiled it and works for me. I was able to convert my raw movie file to DNG files.
#70
Quote from: N.Mendes on May 10, 2013, 11:32:06 PM
In raw mode?
I did a quick test in Raw mode. I wanted to see how much higher I could do above 720p. I tried 1928x850 and 1928x902. I think it was 902. 902 the buffer would fill up and video stops after 700 frames or so.  At 850 I am able to get continuous recordings.

The best I am able to obtain in Raw mode right now is continuous 1928x850 at 24fps. I plan to crop the video to 1920x817 to do 2.35:1 wide screen aspect ratio, which is about 1920x817. The video will have black bars on top and bottom to output at 1920x1080.
#71
Quote from: N.Mendes on May 10, 2013, 11:32:06 PM
In raw mode?

It was in 422 YUV. Not in Raw mode.
#72
CF LEXAR 1000X  in my 5D3. I am able to record continues 1904x 960 at 24 fps or 1904x1080 x 20 fps for single file 422 YUV with lv_rec.

I am thinking if we were able to record to SD and CF, I would be able to obtain 1904x1080 x 24 fps. I noticed the CF card benchmark is slower in liveview vs in playback mode. If it is possible to speed up the CF card in liveview mode, it might be possible to do 24fps with just the CF card. 
#73
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 12, 2012, 02:17:43 PM
I really hope mjpeg will be possible. I am sure a lexar 1000x CF card is fast enough. I guess we still do not know if 5d mark III is able to do it or not until alex tries. 

I am thinking if someone not concern about shallow dept of field or low light performance a good camcorder might have to do for now for higher resolved lines of resolution.  I might look at Panasonic TM900 for 1080p @ 60p for now.  One review http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-HDC-TM900-Camcorder-Review/Sharpness-Performance.htm and other http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ixbt.com%2Fdivideo%2Fmark-ii-vs-tm900.shtml