Messages

For pixel peeping, here's a full-res version of their test image:
http://vcl.itn.liu.se/publications/2014/HKU14/result.png

(from http://vcl.itn.liu.se/publications/2014/HKU14/ )

their method seems to introduce blur in both 100-800 and 100-1600, like a thin softfocus to my eyes... they even mention this near the end of the paper: "However using isotropic filter kernel can introduce blur and color artifacts in the result" - does this mean they'd get sharp results by removing the aa filter?

grats on the citation, and if they work/share with you, even better

I've been using dual iso on 50D on win 8 x64 for about a week, have not seen the green tint you guys showed in your samples. I use ML wb and correct in post

I've noticed the need to use some slight defringing.

When dragging multiple cr2s over cr2hdr.exe it only processes 30 or so images. Here's what happens afterwards: (30 more of them get processed when re-attempted)

here are some sample dngs with the latest tragiclantern build (aug 19?) and cr2hdr (with no exif data, exiftool errors out for me):  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wwmu3uuz6l1e7wd/4qazwI0KH1

I'm thrilled with dual iso, did not expect it to work so well on my aged 50D.

some edited results:
http://31.media.tumblr.com/2dae2151ca0235b14ede9500e55fc888/tumblr_mrtf6cWRtY1qculbmo1_1280.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/899d4bf349e0f74d40cf4d28c7f71b40/tumblr_ms0xaypHSO1qculbmo1_r1_1280.jpg