Quote from: Kharak on October 23, 2013, 01:56:53 PMMade some progress! I set it to Landscape picture style and recorded both RAW and .h264 at ISO 400, 800, and 1000. I believe you are correct that using ISO's other than the native ones you mentioned will result is a larger exposure shift between live view/h264 and the RAW file. My ISO 1000 looked more underexposed than the 400 or 800. However with that said, both the 400 and 800 were still underexposed by more than I'd want compared to what the Live View/Monitor show.
The analog ISO's are 200, 400, 800, 1600 and 3200 (maybe 100, not sure). Theses are the only ones you get in RAW. All other ISO's between or higher than those are digital and will not affect the RAW file.
I use Neutral and set sharpness to max 7+. For extra focus peaking with Digic. Sharpness does not affect RAW files either.
So I made a custom picture style in Canon Picture Style Editor software using the Landscape as a starting point. I then adjusted a midpoint on the curve to Input 130, Output 115 and Color Saturation -1. Saved it out, loaded on camera and recorded both an h.264 and RAW comparing both the landscape picture style and this new custom one. The curve adjustment worked so it looked darker in Live View and closer to what the RAW recorded (using default values in After Effects). I'd still need to play with the saturation/green/red hue as those weren't a perfect match yet but at least from a exposure standpoint I feel more confident in this adjusted picture style than any of the stock ones.
If anyone else has dialed this in better I'd be curious to know what values you're using. Oh and BTW the 'Brightness' in the 'Preliminary adjustment' doesn't get embedded in the picture style. I tried that first and Curves is what actually works.