1
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 650D / T4i
« on: March 24, 2015, 05:28:45 AM »
Now that something i havent realised. So pinkdots are sort off engraved on the camera sensor?
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
will canon t4i ever shoot 1080p, RAWCertainly! If you pocess the power of mordor!
I wanted to give a little encouragement to any 650D'ers out there who haven't taken the ML Raw plunge yet.
We just shot the entire series of the First Five Years @ 1280x720 24fps and many takes were well over several minutes. We used the Sandisk Extreme Pros.
If you want to see it, I posted it in the "Share your Videos" section of this forum: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=12998.0
As canon already implemented Some audio features, inwould say that is verry low priority. Aldo you are always Welkom to implement something yourself.
It would oldo be nice if you can be more specific as to what is missing now
But what are you waiting for exactly? PDR kinda works, right?Well, like you said it
Common sense: do you really expect ML to turn a 18 megapixel sensor into a 162 megapixel one?!
This is exactly what you are asking for (18x3x3 = 162).
This version has some interesting features like various interface choices.
I also modified some things regarding resolution choices. Now I just choose vertical and horizontal resolutions separately (multiples of 16) instead of horizontal and aspect ratio.
I will perform some testing, and if the module will work stable, i then can share it with you.
(I just don't want to burn up any cameras other then mine)
I'm using modified raw_rec from pravdomil's source.
https://bitbucket.org/pravdomil/magic-lantern-hack/commits/all
Ok, another good news.
Thanks to mk11174, we found a timer address for 650D (0xFF527E38), and small hacks now fully working.
This gives us another tiny speed increase: 38.5 Mb/s vs previous 37.7
For example, now you can record 1504x640 (2.35:1) continiously.
When I'm using my favorite resolution 1536x640 now recording time before skipping is about 1.5 minutes, previously it was around 42-44 secs.
I would assume that they are FAT 32 but I will check. Can you help me understand how exfat would make a difference in write rates?I am not exactly sure mate, but it did help me,
Thanks
dave
Anybody stopping you from doing that?
Welcome to open source world
Neither fire nor wind, birth nor death can erase our good deeds
Buddah
turning Dual iso "off" is a solution for "error ISOless PH err(2)" indeed.
now, i have one (1) question:
how can i use dual iso while it is turned off?