Good day. I would like to ask what you think of the new CANON 6D Mark2. I would very much like to take a look at landscape photography at ISO 320+ for a decent dynamic range of 13.2 in 2017 than any competing brand. In my opinion Canon 6D Mark II it's a huge flop, tragedy and nonsense to introduce Canon 6D Mark2 with a dynamic range equal to the Canon 700D, which is 4 years old camera.
So, according to Canon's logic, this means that every photographer will use Canon 6D Mark II at the ISO 320 to have the same dynamic range as any other camera brands (Sony / Nikon / Fuji / Pentax) at ISO 100 in the middle of a sunny day?
Are there at least some advantages when the basic ISO will be 320 when used with Dual-ISO?
So, according to Canon's logic, this means that every photographer will use Canon 6D Mark II at the ISO 320 to have the same dynamic range as any other camera brands (Sony / Nikon / Fuji / Pentax) at ISO 100 in the middle of a sunny day?
Are there at least some advantages when the basic ISO will be 320 when used with Dual-ISO?