i'm not seeing a major difference, what am i doing wrong...
1600x900 raw resolution. and raw picture not jpeg or s2 or anything
400 iso
i tried to grade the raw to match h.264, does that logic add up? I mean am I not seeing this extra dynamic range because I'm not grading according to the situation?
I used "MlRawViewer" to make it .mov
then just threw it in sony vegas as per any other clip. then render to 1080 24p
-In this video the first shot is h.264. The warmer picture (second) is raw. It will alternate h.264-->raw-->h.264--->raw throughout.
Again is my logic just flawed for grading to match h.264? shouldn't there be a noticeable difference in image quality anyway? I'm just not seeing it.. just color and exposure/contrast correction no de-noise or anything.
https://vimeo.com/117347007
1600x900 raw resolution. and raw picture not jpeg or s2 or anything
400 iso
i tried to grade the raw to match h.264, does that logic add up? I mean am I not seeing this extra dynamic range because I'm not grading according to the situation?
I used "MlRawViewer" to make it .mov
then just threw it in sony vegas as per any other clip. then render to 1080 24p
-In this video the first shot is h.264. The warmer picture (second) is raw. It will alternate h.264-->raw-->h.264--->raw throughout.
Again is my logic just flawed for grading to match h.264? shouldn't there be a noticeable difference in image quality anyway? I'm just not seeing it.. just color and exposure/contrast correction no de-noise or anything.
https://vimeo.com/117347007