1
Main Builds / Re: Nightly Builds - try the very latest stuff here
« on: August 27, 2017, 12:08:50 PM »
yeah that make more sense, forgot about the mirror drawback, thanks!
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
quick question.. How do you get the washed out/raw LOOK out of the camera? It seems to be auto colored in CameraRaw in After Effects.
hey everbody.
i have updated my camera with firmwar 1.2.3 and ML is runnung perfect.
the only problem is i need to record 1 hour in one peace and the camera shuts down after 29:56 minutes .does anybody know how i can solve this problem?
you guys are doing a brillant job on ML.thx for that.
Can you check if this helps? https://bitbucket.org/hudson/magic-lantern/issue/2022/mlv_play-destroy-data#comment-10957992
Its funny, this thread is 50 pages long & still people don't get that the 60D isn't a good RAW camera.
Continuous recording is in the realm of seconds, you get a few more if you change the aspect ratio & the most useable resolution size (for upscaling to HD) is 1280x...
For example:
2.67:1 @ 1280x480 = 32 seconds
Your best option is to crank up the H264 Bit Rate hack for close ups & use bursts of RAW for those wider shots that will need detail.
There are plenty of people making v.good films with just H264 - check out this guy on vimeo:
http://vimeo.com/kendyty
If you want RAW & can't afford the 5D3, then check out the page for RAW video capabilities for all cameras & see what else is good:
http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=6215.0
@comurit
I will be buying the GH4. I will definitely keep my 60D for seconds where I need RAW shoots, and also for ML in general. The 5d 3 is obviously the best option to shoot raw. The one thing to consider when shooting Raw is the space it takes up on your Harddrive. On the other hand I have gone back to counting shots and rehearsing a shot similar to how I did when using super 8 years back.. I have recently finished a few projects with ML Raw on the 60D that went into terabytes. With the native canon codec this same amount would have been substantially less
Here are a few examples of commercial work I have done recently every shot was ML Raw on 60D:
I don't expect to get as much latitude from the new GH4 as I do in ML raw. I will use both cameras as tools for when needed.
Cheers,
Janssen
Since I've been pondering the same question, I can give you some hopefully useful thoughts to consider.
First of all, let's assume that still photography isn't important for you. Let's also assume that money is not a deciding factor.
You can get your hand on a 5D3 nowadays for around $2500 (plus or minus $200 depending how much you like buying from eBay retailers). Add about $400 to that for a few CF cards and maybe another $100 for a couple of batteries. Total cost is within $3500 for a camera you can go out and shoot with.
Blackmagic 4K is $3k for the body, add another $350 for about 3 SSD 128Gb drives. Now here's the catch...you absolutely will need an external battery unless you're planning on only shooting indoors. So you really need to add $300-500 at least for that. Total cost is within $4000 for a camera you can go out and shoot with.
Dynamic range is roughly in the same ballpark, about 11 stops with maybe the 5D3 having a slight edge over the Blackmagic.
If you're planning on shooting in low-light conditions and with only available light, then the Blackmagic won't work for you. The ISO400 is not sensitive enough for anything less than a well lit indoor, or daytime exterior. You won't be able to push the footage in post without massive noise. If your bulk of shooting is nighttime, dark interiors etc, you will need the 5D3.
How important is resolution for you? 4K is much more future proof, but right now it's simply overkill unless you're planning massive re-framing in post.
The 5D3 full size sensor is both a blessing and a curse. I can tell you that most pro DP's despise it and much prefer the Super-35mm sized APS-C.
Both cameras can be reliable and unreliable. They both can suffer from dropped frames, with the 5D3 having a slight advantage in the sense that you can set it up to stop recording if frames are dropped (which is not possible with the Blackmagic).
Blackmagic has inputs for 1/4" audio lines, however the in-camera levels are poorly implemented and the build-in amp crappy. Still, it's a bit more "pro" than going into the mini-jack on the 5D3.
How important is it for you to use an external monitor? The Blackmagic monitor kinda sucks, especially in bright light. The 5D3 monitor is kinda small and annoying to pull focus, particularly with a full frame sensor. If you plan on using an external monitor with the Blackmagic, do know that you'll need one with SDI inputs which might push the price up (no HDMI out on the BMPC).
Lastly, how important is it to be inconspicuous when you shoot? A well rigged Blackmagic will look more "pro" than a handheld DSLR in public places.
Depending how important the above points are, should make it pretty clear on which camera you should buy.
P.S.
You will need a faster computer than what you have either way. Resolve is CPU and most importantly GPU hungry. I wouldn't recommend anything less than a 2012 model.
What do you have doubts about?
hi guys downloaded the latest ml nightly built
and bought sandisk extreme 16gb 45mbps card too still can't get more the 51 frames recorded on 1720x968p
and 130 frames on 1280x720p
help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
please![]()
@Bookshop.Inc
"Yeah I would love the GOP Slice bit rate hack for the 60D..."
So would I but have you tried adjusting the bit rate on the 60D as per the Gop Slice specs? I have and I have gotten pretty high bit rates (plus 100Mbs)and decent h.264 video as a result.
Just uploaded a new video I did with my 60D - thought I share here! Shot in Sydney by the way.
60D suffers from Bad Pixels & RawMagic doesn't get rid of them (there was a build in the first post that got rid of them in-camera) - AE probably got rid of them for you & i don't think Resolve will do this.
Also, with a x1.5 anamorphic i found 5:3 1280x768 @ 23.976fps gave me 16secs & once unsqueezed (1920x768) upscaled very nicely to give you an aspect ratio of 2.39:1 (1920x803) (with some of the sides slightly cropped).