Messages

1

Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video

« on: August 15, 2013, 04:19:45 AM »

@ 1% - was A1ex's buffering raw_rec.mo applied to the SixThirty build? Just wondering because I stumbled upon the thread it looked like in best case scenario, frames captured were doubled.

2

Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video

« on: August 14, 2013, 05:02:34 AM »

I shot this using 640 mode using 1280 x 544, but shot at 22 FPS. No 3x mode since I was using a 50mm and it was too tight. I used a Pentax 50mm f/4 Macro for the close ups. All natural light and no CC just white balanced.

3

Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video

« on: August 13, 2013, 05:20:03 AM »

My video showcasing RAW's dynamic range in natural light. I think the difference is the gradation and smooth roll-off of highlights that keep me shooting RAW compared to H.264. But it could be a perception thing too.

4

Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video

« on: June 20, 2013, 07:43:02 AM »

The latest build by 1% is rock solid for me. I did 1024x512 reso without any issues on my Sandisk. Shot over 3000 frames without dropping a single frame. I like that reso better than 960x544.

Thanks for all the work 1%.

5

Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video

« on: May 21, 2013, 09:35:12 PM »

Great idea on the lower frame rates and higher reso. I'm going to try 720p on lower FPS to see if it is usable.

On another note, I'm getting RAW files that have the error: This Ain't an LV_REC file. I thought that was fixed.
 
For reference, this happens to 1 out of 3 files and it's happening on the OSX raw2dng.app gui.

Was this fixed for the windows raw2dng.exe application? If windows doesn't have this issue, I might have to switch workflow to windows 7.

6

Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video

« on: May 20, 2013, 09:35:33 PM »

Sorry meant: 1152x434 continous.

It's really wide so I've had to step back for framing.

Looking to do something more exciting with my next video and RAW at the1152x434.

Here's my test a few days ago after 1% made this possible to record on RAW on 600D at 960x480.

7

Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video

« on: May 20, 2013, 03:21:17 PM »

So I'm very confused on how people are shooting the RAW videos.

Is the consensus to change the setting in the standard Canon menu to 640x480 60FPS then in ML change the resolution to something like 1280 x 400. Then do a manual frame per second override and set it to 24 FPS?

I ask because I've been shooting at 1920x1080 24FPS and using ML to set reso to 1152x400 which my max continous shooting reso even on my Sandisk Extreme 95mb/s card.

This gives me tremendous results, but the aspect ration is pretty narrow.

How are you guys doing your RAW shooting?

8

Tragic Lantern / Re: Bit rate investigation - altering ratio between P and I frame sizes

« on: February 06, 2013, 10:04:52 PM »

Is there a current release of this firmware for me to test out? Kinda interested to see what the results are for real world video versus the still examples posted on this thread.

Saw a few links on downloading, but not sure which was the current firmware everyone was testing.