Messages

Great, thanks!

Just tried it out and it works for me...

[My questions regards the image resolution:]

Hi,
First I would like to thank you for the great work!
I use this script as the standard procedure for the Dual ISO images of my 550D.

My questions regards the image resolution:
The raw (CR2) image has a resolution of 5184x3456 pixels.
The resulting DNG (generated with ML's cr2hdr) has half of the vertical resolution, which is understood: 2601x1732 pixels.
The final jpg generated by this uniform_exposure.py script has the same resolution as the DNG - logic: 2601x1732 pixels.

Today I've tried Luminance-HDR for more "dramatic" effects. I used the DNG as input (2601x1732) and choose the output resolution to be 100% of the input file.

Interestingly the outputfile now had the same dimensions as the CR2 input file: 5184x3456.
When I zoom to 100% it looks like all details seem still to be retained. (See 100% comparison center crop at the bottom) 

I'm a complete noob, when it comes to technical details.
Can someone explain, why the output of Luminance-HDR has higher resolution than the output of uniform-exposure.py, while the details seem to be retained and the same file was used as input?
Could also uniform_exposure.py output the original resolution of the CR2 rather than of the DNG.

The files I used:
CR2 by 550D using ML Dual-ISO
DNG by ML cr2hdr
JGP by uniform_exposure.py
JPG by Luminance-HDR

Thanks for your help!

Left: output of uniform_exposure.py (2601x1732)    ||   Right: output of Luminance-HDR (5184x3456)