i realy enjoy reading idiots and noobs who are accting liek MAster PRos it make fun here ..alot ..and i mean HERE not here..
ML is realy cool but is poopoulated by to many ``pro``s
ML is realy cool but is poopoulated by to many ``pro``s
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Malcolm Debono on October 21, 2013, 01:55:28 PM
Never encountered any hot/dead pixels so far. I guess that's one benefit of using ACR since it automatically removes them for photos (so that would also apply for image sequences).
Regarding noise reduction, I use Neat Video in Premiere (before exporting the master), and then add a bit of grain through FilmConvert to add some texture.
Quote from: ilia on October 20, 2013, 05:16:22 AMu have Canon Dslr ? u must have DPP ..and turst me ..u dont need nothink more for edit RAW file to tiff or jpeg..but ofc u can convert file thousend times if u like
I recently switched my workflow from After Effects(ACR) to Davinci Resolve 10. The speed of rendering proxies and the ability to relink and grade the Raw files in Resolve is so much more practical and powerful. What is your preference and why?
Quote from: ItsMeLenny on August 28, 2013, 09:41:46 AM
Shutter speed is that 1/30, the shutter is opening for one 30th of a second.
Quote from: ariznaf on March 25, 2013, 01:55:49 PM
Of course that would be the optimal solution, but I don't expect them to do it. May be it is not even possible for them it the metadata is encrypted in the raw (I don't know it it is).
May be it is easier if you have access to Canon's internals in the firmware, but I don't know if it is easy or even possible.
But it would be of great help to make Canon's functions of dust removal and dead/hot pixels elimination usefull to people who don't use Canon DPP.
Quote from: james_screech on March 25, 2013, 04:12:19 PM
Its common for astrophotographers to remove one of the IR filters on DSLRs to improve the red sensitivity of cameras (and / or add light pollution rejection filters). This however gives normal daylight images a colour cast. Using CWB can overcome this for one lighting type but not all without re-doing the CWB. The standard "white balance correction" feature could help here however this does can not correct colour enough.
Would it be possible to either extend the range of white balance correction and / or have an automatic white balance correction feature? I envisage the automatic system being similar to CWB, if you take a picture of a white card with white balance set to automatic the software could then use the actual colour cast in the picture to correct the colour and apply this to all "standard" colour balance settings.
James
Quote from: MichalLeder on March 23, 2013, 08:28:40 PM
Betelgeuza,
2. What you think looks like panstarr comet is a new moon
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 14 queries.