Messages

i will look into that! thank you very much

damn it man, did you use any post stabilzation? do you got any tips gliding i got a hd4000

Hello everyone,

I have just shot a vacation video on the ''Landscape'' picture profile, now since its RAW i heard it does not matter in what picture style i shoot since it's going to adjusted anyway.
Now here is the problem for me whenever i choose the colorspace ''BMD Film'' Setting my footage always seems to be underexposed by up to 2 points. Is there any way to fix this problem? Is there any picture profile setting that maybe matched the ''BMD Film'' color space so we can get correct exposure.

Thanks !

Here is a grab of what's coming soon!

i had the exact same effect 3 days ago when i took a picture, i actually pissed in my pants and i thought i had fried my sensor or something :O, took the battery out, took lens off and on and it never happend since than.

Davinci Resolve my friend.

Here is a little vacation video i am grading, trying to match kodak's famous vision3 5219 film stock

what do you guys think ?

https://vimeo.com/104853746

Nice work! did you shoot in 50fps and slowed it down?

Sickkk stuff! what ND filter do you use? looks like you have no color cast

Italian Music Videoclip

Shot entirely with 5dmk3 and ML RAW!

A love story between Friuli ( north east italy ) and Paris!


:: Dir // Dop // Edit // Story : Nicola De Prato
:: Camera : Canon 5DmkIII (with Magic Lantern RAW )
:: Lens : Canon 24-70 2.8 // Canon 70-200 2.8 II // Canon 100 Macro 2.8
:: Graded in Davinci Resolve
:: Edited in Fcp 7


50fps > Davinci > Fcp7 > Export > BOOOOM

Hope you enjoy it >>>> feel free to comment

amazing, car shot at 0:06 , did it have image stabilzer ? did your lenses have image stabilzer?

do apsc + teleconverter

nope , got the entire CF full with continioous recording (komputerbay 64gb)

Well you can render in proress444 on windows. just a little way around

I'm not using a windows machine, but I don't think you can.

So avi (losless) is my way to go ? or is there a windows based codec that is just as good as prores444?

thanks alot

Yes, ProRes 4444 is VERY good! But still is a lossy type format.

So, uncompressed lossless is the best format to retain all original detail of the DNGs. From my experience, with a decent computer you can edit lossless formats no problem in Premiere.

Best for holding quality is original DNGs or Lossless (Animation/AVI) and they're basically the same file sizes (DNG and Lossless).

So is there any way to export it from davinci resolove to Prores4444 on windows ?

To give you some reference points....

Animation/AVI = Lossless 14-Bit (for ML RAW), up to 300 Mbps bitrate (no loss, best quality)
ProRes 4444 = Lossy 12-Bit, ~ 200-250 Mbps bitrate (one of the best lossy formats out there, if not the best)
ProRes 422 HQ = Lossy 10-Bit, ~ 150-200 Mbps bitrate (next best lossy format for ProRes, if not altogether)

So, all pretty good stuff to be working with.

ProRes goes down to ProRes Proxy at about 40 Mbps bitrate, but still 10-Bit I believe, which really isn't big screen worthy, just used for offline editing mostly.

Thanks alot for your help man,

so to sums things up :
- Proress 4444 is 12 bit and also very good right?
- Animation/AVI is the best when it comes to holding my 14 bit footage/quality , (how easy does this edit in premiere btw ?)

what do you think suits me the best for as far as holding the quality goes

( dont worry about hard drive space, i got 30TB data centre )

Thanks! Maybe a stupid question, but are there certain precautions you can take to prevent sensor overheating?

wait, is this a temporary thing? how do you know if you overheated your sensor?

Alright Alright, we are getting somewhere.

You say highly compressed h264 on vimeo right ? so it is going to be compressed to 8 bit anyway? and also, if i grade my 14 bit footage in davinci resolve and export it to 10 bit lets say how bad will be quality of my image be degraded?

Thanks for the time btw

As 'same' meaning output ProRes 4444 (or any ProRes) with DaVinci Resolve on Windows?

Not sure, get the free DR version and check it out, but usually Windows can read/input ProRes if QuickTime is installed, but Windows apps usually don't output ProRes (it's Apple proprietary codec), usually AVI or some Avid codec format.

EDIT: I believe ProRes 4444 is 12-bit anyhow... For TOTALYY BEST QUALITY save uncompressed as Animation or AVI (large files).

Well its going to run on vimeo, and on a cinema screen ( not kidding ) thats why i am so hectic about the 14bit

Is there some reason it has to be Pro Res 4444 ?
There is a lot of different Codec to chose from.
Try the Blackmagic RGB 10bit , Avid DNxHD 444 of even export to tiff image sequence and use
FFmpeg to convert to Pro Res 4444 if its a must .

well the reaon is, correct me if i am wrong but....

10 bit is lower than the 14bit footage, i mean we shoot magic lantern partly because of the 14 bit, and 10 bit degrades the colors right?

Thanks alot!

i presume i can do the same with davinci resolve?

Hello everyone,

I am fairly new to the scene of Magic Lantern and i have just installed Magic Lantern on my 5D Mark III and recorded some beautifull 14 bit RAW footage and it looks absolutely amazing. Coming from 8 bit H264 the workflow was easy as stealing candy from a little kid....

And i have came across one big problem which is the next.

1. Turn Camera ON = Check
2. Record RAW 14 bit footage = Check
3. Import = Check
4. Convert to DNG = Check
5. Import to Davinci Resolve and grade = Check
6. Export to Proress 4444 = ERROR.

After i did my research i found out Windows doesnt allow Prores4444 to to exported natively. Which came as a big shock to me because there is a reason the footage looks amazing ( 14 bit, and raw quality ) My question to you smarties is please save me and tell me its possible to export them in Prores4444 because if i cant i feel like i wasted alot of time and stress for nothing haha but im sure there is a way to do it.

Anyway thanks alot!


PC Specs :
- CPU : i7 2600K (Overclocked stable to 4,8ghz)
- GPU : AMD Radeon HD 6950
- RAM : 32 GB Corsair Ram

Im sorry to be such a nervous rat over this, its just that im scared as hell but i just got it installed and it works fine. also i thought ML never Bricked/Killed a camera before.
once again im sorry

its more stable than 1.2.3 right ?

i'm the exact same boat as you do...

i want tested firmware which is 1.1.3 but it has the bootflag issue.

and i also want the bootflag issue to be solved but 1.2.3 is not (fully) stable i think

the struggle

i was about to post : is this the first true bricked camera by a magic lantern user