Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
Quote from: iaburn on Yesterday at 08:16:24 PMVery interesting, the ideal scenario for Dual ISO is when you ETTR at the base ISO. By underexposing you are just "wasting" dynamic range on the highlights, but it shouldn't affect the comparison if the dynamic range of the scene is wide enough.
Quote from: names_are_hard on May 20, 2024, 06:44:16 PMI now have a decent set of test files. Sunlit window scene with shadows and a range of colours. Shots taken in 100/100 up to 100/3200. Three sets, exposing for ISO 100: "ETTR-ish" (about 1 stop overexposed?), 2-stops under, and 4-stops under (this one includes 100/6400). Why under? Because Walter took a look at the first set and said they were weird; good highlight recovery but not much change to dark areas. So perhaps 200D prefers it the opposite way to old cams.
If you want to compare, DM me for the links. It's about 250MB per set.
Quote from: iaburn on March 10, 2024, 07:39:31 PMI'm curious to see if there is a visible gain or not with dual ISO on the 200D
Quote from: vastunghia on May 18, 2024, 06:48:29 PMEDIT: anyone can explain gitHub-based cedricp/MLVFS commits dated Jun - Jul 2022? His work seems to be based on commit 9f81918 [May 31, 2016].
Page created in 0.061 seconds with 11 queries.