It's part of Canon's efforts to cripple the "entry level" bodies so their 7D would look better, so no. There is no way to enable them. I don't know if you can enable it through software like ML though.
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuoteNo no, not all picture parts at all, I want only the current "neighbours" (left/top neighbour) while shooting - just to make sure, I don't move to far to get in trouble while stitching.Yup. I'm still experimenting with it but it's really hard to do without any "help", because it's very hard to tell which parts you have covered. If you have a gap somewhere in the middle of the end result (near the main subject), then the whole picture is unusable.
Hmm,, Brenizer correct - maybe we need a mode for this order of the pictures too. I never did that, but I think you shoot the middle picture with the subject first, and then go around. Correct?
Quote from: dmilligan on August 16, 2014, 03:07:01 AMI don't know about other cameras, but on my 60D, you can press unlock to get the ML overlay while in playback mode. I use it mainly for the peaking and the histogram. If I want to look at the Canon histogram, the image will be too small for me to see anything useful, so I prefer using the ML overlay
There is no ML histogram in Playback, so I don't know what you are taking about. Maybe you think the Canon histogram is from ML? Canon histograms are not based on raw data (again read the link)
Quote from: ayshih on August 16, 2014, 03:12:03 AMAh, that's what I couldn't figure out, thanks.
That's correct: in playback mode, ML only has access to the processed data, so it's not possible to produce a raw histogram, unlike in quick review mode, where the raw buffer is accessible.
Quote from: dmilligan on August 16, 2014, 02:50:50 AMWell I just did a quick test...I set 1 picture style to neutral, with max negative sharpness, contrast and saturation. Second picture style with standard, with max sharpness, contrast and saturation. Used auto ETTR, then shot 2 pictures in raw, alternating the picture style.
Again, it's not called a raw exposure aid for nothing. Did you guys even read the link? Like, I don't know, maybe the first sentence.
Quote from: dmilligan on August 15, 2014, 10:22:49 PMUsing raw exposure aids is good for live view, but what about shooting photos through the viewfinder? The histogram (even the ML one) from the playback is based on the jpg preview, right? In such a case, the picture style affects the histogram because it affects the jpg preview. I currently use neutral with maximum minus sharpness, contrast and saturation
For raw, you really shouldn't be judging exposure by "looks", you are only getting lied to. You should exclusively be using the raw exposure aids. What might be beneficial is if it were possible to craft some sort of picture style that rendered overexposure in raw the same as overexposure in YUV, that way you could use fast YUV zebras (raw zebras are slow and use the CPU, YUV zebras don't). IDK if something like that is even possible.
Quote from: dmilligan on August 10, 2014, 05:44:12 AM
1. fixed
2. expected behavior (this is kind of separate from the bulb timer, but I put it in the same menu, maybe thats a little confusing. But I have no way of determining if the bulb timer is enabled from a module).
Quote from: barepixels on August 05, 2014, 11:40:31 PMI think the TS just wants to copy the composition. I don't think the intention is to "change the EXIF info" to make it seem as if he/she shot the image. It can be a good way to learn about composition, if you really want to do it that way.
you mean you want to copy someone else photo and make it seem to be shot from your camera?
even if you do not mean to be that way, this can lead to legal problems NO?
Quote from: ayoub on August 01, 2014, 03:00:58 PMAny lens, regardless of the mount, when mounted on a crop factor body, will be affected by the crop factor. EF-S means it can only be mounted on crop frame bodies and not full frame. The focal length specification on the EF-S lens is not the 35mm equivalent.
How about the optical distortion ? Because to get a "35mm" look on an APS-C I need a 24mm with EF mount. But 24mm applies a certain distortion to the image, would that disappear on a APS-C?
Quote from: garry23 on July 29, 2014, 03:20:31 AMMaybe have ETTR link to bulb timer, and we do everything in bulb mode? I don't think it's possible to set exposure >30s (32s) in manual mode. With ML bulb timer, bulb mode is pretty much manual mode without 30s limit anyway
The key thing is to ask a coder to tweak ETTR to provide exposures greater than 30(32) seconds.
Let's hope.
Quote from: garry23 on July 29, 2014, 01:58:19 AMHmm, perhaps a ND calculator integrated with ETTR? Workflow will be as follows:
@brapodam
I understand fully what you are saying.
I'm suggesting that with ETTR we have another workflow.
Taking an ETTR reading is seconds.
To be clear, my ideal workflow would be as follows (based on having a fixed ND 'stack':
1. Compose & focus, of course;
2. Put on the filter(s) you have - for most of us having one or two is a luxury, ie we don't normally use the ND as a 'variable' in LE shooting (no pun intended wrt variable NDs);
3. Set ISO 100 and a mid aperture and get ML to estimate the LE shutter speed;
4. Adjust aperture and ISO to get a shuuter speed nearer to your artist desire, assuming you weren't lucky first time.
As I say, if ETTR could be enhanced to give us a shutter speed, for a given ISO and aperture, I believe it will greatly help with LE, as you wony need any apps!
Quote from: barepixels on July 27, 2014, 04:15:40 PMI guess if you're doing day to night or night to day, just shoot wide open and ETTR should take care of the ISO and shutter speed. I'm not sure about white balance though. I don't do time lapses, but I do occasionally experiment with it when there are developments in silent pics
thnx Alex. I will go refresh my reading on ETTR again. If you have any recommendation for camera settings, it would be greatly appreciated
Quote from: josepvm on July 25, 2014, 11:57:21 AMYes, I have succeeded in shooting a simple test while using ETTR. I haven't used mlvdump though. I used the MLV batch converter from this thread http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=10198.0
Has anyone succeeded to get a fullres silent timelapse in MLV format using ETTR ?
Quote from: MDC on July 22, 2014, 06:47:40 PMI just use the cr2hdr plugin from this thread: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=11056.0
Just done this for the first time (windows and it didn't work - soon discovered the CR2 file needs to be in the same folder as the cr2hdr.exe file.
Dragging the image to the exe creates the .dng file in the same folder.
If you have them you can open in adobe camera raw by opening in photoshop OR open in Lightroom (works for me - though I've seen suggestions it doesn't).
Quote from: gcrook on July 22, 2014, 01:55:00 PMI've used a self-compiled build from the main brach with dmilligan's silent.mo on my 60D without any problems, but I've compiled a build from his branch, and here's the link:
Oh i see.Yes for the 60D i used the July 22 nghtly with the silent.mo you posted on post #153.So its ok to continue with 60D and July 22 nighly if i understand correctly?
I actually did the same with my 550D but with the silent.mo in mk11174 put in latest 60D build only with full res silent pics (no mlv).
Should i stop using that as well?
I have no means to compile the build for the 60D you say though,if someone has already done that and wouldn't mind posting a link to it
i would continue shooting further tests or any kind of test you or anyone else would like for me to do.
Quote from: mk11174 on July 22, 2014, 07:06:23 AMAh, yes it works now
Do you have the mlv_play and mlv_rec modules loaded too??? I think both have to also be loaded to make this link correct.
Quote from: barepixels on July 22, 2014, 06:40:11 AMSame error on my 60D, compiled from main branch and replaced silent.mo
trying on my 5d2
tcc: error: undefined symbol 'mv_fill_wbal'
tcc: error: undefined symbol 'mv_fill_rtci'
[E] failed to link modules
What I did was take mk11174's
https://bitbucket.org/mk11174/magic-lantern/downloads/magiclantern-Nightly.2014Jul19.5D2212.zip
and swap out the silent.mo
Page created in 0.114 seconds with 14 queries.