See you keep saying I use this and I use that... I, I, I, me, me, me. It's all matter of preference. It is all about the job and what DP wants to accomplish. Stop trying to change people's opinion on what equipment to use. If GH2 works for you, then return your BMCC and stick with it. I love the look canon gives me (for what I do) but I don't go to Sony or Panasonic forums and tell them how their cameras suck and that it is OK to leave it. Everything that you said (wasted your energy on typing) is a waist! You did not change my mind as everything you told here is old news. Yes, I like canon look and I am sticking with it (for now). I take canon 5d or 6d over GH2 anytime of the day, so would you please give it a rest. You have made some decisions for yourself - that's great! Don't force them to people who have made theirs! Keep shooting and have fun!
Woah dude, nobody is putting a gun to your head.
I will use the gh2 for this and BMCC for that. I'm just thinking that living in a canon bubble isn't very healthy.
I'm sorry that you and I bought the underachieving 6d and it's only TRUE strength is low light.
I would bet $100 if you used a gh2 for a week and got familiar with it using the latest patch
Your opinion of canon might change. Are you upset that the gh2 does in FACT go toe to toe with the detail of an epic?
Like I said way earlier, I'll continue to follow the ML development for the 6D, and will dump the 6d in a heart beat
When the 7d mk2 is released. I see people dump canon for the gh2 and never look back (for video) where as I was looking for something from Canon to accompany my gh2 (6D) and have been pretty disappointed. I've yet to see anything from the 6d look as nice as a 5d or 7d. How can canon allow this to happen? For $2k
and a newer model camera it underachieves compared to older models? What's the extra money for? Wifi that is only useful for photos?