Author Topic: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert  (Read 5105 times)

beauchampy

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« on: December 03, 2013, 08:15:26 PM »
Any feedback greatly appreciated.

I know theres a bit of aliasing here and there - I need to get my hands on a 5d III !!

britom

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
Re: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2013, 09:51:37 PM »
SUPERB!
7D Builds with RAW support: http://bit.ly/14Llzda

arrinkiiii

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
  • ML ADDICTED 7D
Re: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2013, 12:06:13 PM »

It's good. I have enjoy to see it  :)

I think you need to be more careful in the light ore the lack of that. 

Africashot

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2013, 12:24:21 PM »
Making food look as delicious as it is can be complicated, I am certainly ready for lunch after watching this, therefore well done! I am with Arrinkiii on the fact that some extra lighting would have helped in some (very few) shots, but I am also still looking for a good portable solution when it comes to lighting in the field, not easy...
ML 5D2 & T3i

beauchampy

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
Re: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2013, 12:26:10 PM »
It's good. I have enjoy to see it  :)

I think you need to be more careful in the light ore the lack of that.


Yep, I was actually let down by someone on getting some LED panels for the shoot. It was too late to hire and I had no budget anyway. Ended up having to use available light which wasn't so bad shooting wide open on the Sigma 1.4. Has led to some noise issues though...

arrinkiiii

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
  • ML ADDICTED 7D
Re: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2013, 02:17:01 PM »
but I am also still looking for a good portable solution when it comes to lighting in the field, not easy...

Yes, like me. Would like to buy some good/large led's but no money for that, unfortunately. So i got 2 of this http://www.ebay.com/itm/180931011259?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649   since i already have the bulbs, i just use 4 bulbs of 50w in each one. Very cheap and it make a big difference if you want to put some light in the background, on the subject, etc...  Light is everything, almost everything. But can be the difference for a professional work or amateur work

Yep, I was actually let down by someone on getting some LED panels for the shoot. It was too late to hire and I had no budget anyway. Ended up having to use available light which wasn't so bad shooting wide open on the Sigma 1.4. Has led to some noise issues though...


Also like me (and for sure for a lot of people), wend you depend on other people something can go wrong... and the budget that i got for my work is always to much small... almost not paying for the cameraman (myself) and the edition (myself). But is a good work that you make. Keep going  :D

limey

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2013, 02:34:40 AM »
I was really impressed by the filming and editing. Nice job. Makes me want to go do a commercial for a bistro now. At the end of the video it looks like your slider might have reached the end of the rail? There is a bump.

beauchampy

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
Re: First bit of commercial RAW work - 5D II - RAW - Film Convert
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2013, 07:13:46 PM »
I was really impressed by the filming and editing. Nice job. Makes me want to go do a commercial for a bistro now. At the end of the video it looks like your slider might have reached the end of the rail? There is a bump.

Actually that's a weird abnormality.. I had three takes of that shot, but the actors weren't looking quite right apart from in that take. For some reason there's a weird frame bump.. I never reached the end of the slider. I kind of put it down to a glitch with ML and raw, but still thought the actors looked better in that shot so ran with it.