ALL the shots of the AVCHD, out of the camera, are better!

Believe me, I'm as equally impressed by what Panasonic has done with their MFT cameras. I'm loving them. The interesting thing about photography is the viewer (not taker) did not see the original scene. It's just a pretty picture/video to them. Again, all the MFT's video is beautiful to me. However, the RAW footage is capturing a way-more accurate reality, both in lighting and color. Faces (skin) is where I believe the compressed video really shows its weaknesses. This RAW video is the first video I've ever shot where I'm getting (to me) naturally looking faces.
Yes, there is more workflow, but (despite my current shortcomings) it is not that hard, or time-consuming, if you don't go for perfect. I copy the RAW files to my computer and run them through RAWanizer STRAIGHT to Cineform 422. It takes, maybe 15 seconds per clip? I then drop the Cineform clips into Vegas Studio (the cheap version) and the AVCHD clips. If the AVCHD is good then I'm good of course. BUT, if I want to make changes the Cineform 422 responds, the AVCHD does not (for me). In other words, my video is getting better and better, the more I learn about grading. The AVCHD is more or less static. Again, I love it.
@ShootingStars, have you tried RAW? If not, try the simplest workflow like me. I think you'll be glad you did.