had some time to take photos with dual iso today. here is what i think.
this is hdr properly made. there are some quirks to the process though. and to taking photos as well. it feels a little like developing photos. because you do not see on the screen of display the photos. you see some kind of lines there. for a second it shows large resolution with lines then smaller resolution. and you do not know what you took, can’t tell if it properly in focus. and only on computer you develop the raw file you can see what you got. before i did not like raw files. people said that raw is digital negative. well jpg is also digital negative, you can edit it just as raw file. now there is a point of using raw with dual iso. i really like the dinamic range on the photos with dual iso. just take more time developing them. i would avoid taking photos where there is a difference in brightness because i would have to espose either on the bright or dark part. now i can take a photo and get what i can see. and i like that there is only one photo. because with bracketing you take a few photos and people would have moved, or leaves on branches would have moved. and even when you combine them in hdr the photos do not look right. they look like they make you puke, too many colors, hallow where overlap with bright and shadows. dual iso does not have those, single photo, no hallow in overlaping areas of brightness and shadow. thank you a lot. but does need work, like main is to see the photo you took without the lines etc, so that you knew what you took, so that you can tell if it is sharp, or at least not revet to lower resolution in preview in half a second. thanks
