600D/T3i Raw Video

[AriLG]

Why is the file considered "unsafe" ?

Is there alternate download ?

[alephone]

 I got 800 frames on 1024x576 before it stopped and about 67 frames on 1280x720, so it did add a small pop to it.  The magenta frames are back for me though.  The Canon menu is set to 1920x1080 24p. I'm going to try some other variations but these are the first magenta frames I have seen in a while now =( .

[1%]

Try with dialog timer disabled. Should drop CPU usage and have less pink frames. Also 640x480 with GD off should give the lowest CPU usage.



What is unsafe.. bit bucket won't let me upload to that repo for some reason, it logs me out.

[robrock_68]

what about the new streaming that a1ex released? is gonna improve buffering on the 600d?

Where is that located? curious about that. I would like to locate someone that has that filter and see what the results are with RAW. Trying to message the maker of the video test to see if they would be willing to try it and see how it does.

[Sane__]

I got 800 frames on 1024x576 before it stopped and about 67 frames on 1280x720, so it did add a small pop to it.  The magenta frames are back for me though.  The Canon menu is set to 1920x1080 24p. I'm going to try some other variations but these are the first magenta frames I have seen in a while now =( .

does 1280x720 is 24 fps?

[Robbe]

I made a quick benchmark of a SanDisk Extreme 45MB/s. After formatting it to exFAT file system, it gives stable 20+MB write speeds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI4XZPAMoZk

The file was there "600D 102.fir" (70K) on a brand new Sandisk Extreme 32GB SDHC U1, 45MB/s. Have tried exFAT formatted in both Mac and Windows, and with ML 2.3. Same text each time: "Update file can not be found. Please check the memory card andre load battery than try again".
Have also tried another new SD Sandisk Extreme 32GB SDHC U1 95MB/s.
No problems installing ML 2.3 on the cards when formatted as FAT32.

[AriLG]

What is unsafe.. bit bucket won't let me upload to that repo for some reason, it logs me out.

Well, I was not able a few hours ago to download this version. now I could...

300 (or so) at 1280x544x25 (1:2.39). DG off. the screen freezes after 1 or 2 second (but continues recording till 300 is reached).

SanDisk 16GB 95MB.

[Jonit]

Quick test of color correction capabilities of 14-bit RAW.
1728x692 @ 12fps

[N/A]

Hot damn. 440 frames @ 1280x512, 23.976 fps. GD off.

[Jonit]

Tried the same on my 600D without success. Cant install ML. Says: "Update file cannot be found".
Which version did you install, latest nightly? See that you have 3 version of autoexec.bin.

you need to have "600D-102.FIR" on your SD card. I was testing also other builds of ML at that time, that's why i had 3 different autoexec files on my card.

[BenRott]

is there also a way not to recort direct at the SD-Cart, but to send the RAW-Files with HDMI- to my Blackmagic Hyperdec Shuttle?

[1%]

Sure, just like you can browse the web on your PC via headphone jack.

[SamW4tson]

And like you record 1080p RAW video on a 1100D.

[Robbe]

you need to have "600D-102.FIR" on your SD card. I was testing also other builds of ML at that time, that's why i had 3 different autoexec files on my card.

The file was there "600D 102.fir" (70K) on a brand new Sandisk Extreme 32GB SDHC U1, 45MB/s. Have tried exFAT formatted in both Mac and Windows, and with ML 2.3. Same text each time: "Update file can not be found. Please check the memory card and reload battery than try again".
Have also tried another new SD Sandisk Extreme 32GB SDHC U1 95MB/s.
No problems installing ML 2.3 on the cards when formatted as FAT32.

[N/A]

Use EoSCard to make it bootable

[Robbe]

Use EoSCard to make it bootable

Done that in both Mac and Windows. Same result.
Is there any difference in what order it is done? That is, first format exFAT, made ​​it bootable and then copy ML 2.3?

[N/A]

Weird, I have a Sandisk 95 formatted to exFat, works beautifully.

New build, 1152x496, got almost a solid minute of footage. Upscales really well to 720p (1280x552).

[AriLG]

I would suggest preparing a "data sheet" in which people would feel in all date they can in order to try and assume the current sweet spot.

If that's ok with everyone, I'll prepare a data list for us to feel (as of now it hard to know what's what as people use different cards, different builds, different fps - 24 or 25 - and the list goes on...).

[Robbe]

Weird, I have a Sandisk 95 formatted to exFat, works beautifully.

Ooops! Got to the end ExFAT to work, BUT noticed that I couldn't change the image quality when Canon 600D was "normal", that is when I reset back to basics in my attempts with ExFAT.
This is how it now looks when the camera is "normal" and trying to change image quality back from sRAW:

[N/A]

I would suggest preparing a "data sheet" in which people would feel in all date they can in order to try and assume the current sweet spot.

If that's ok with everyone, I'll prepare a data list for us to feel (as of now it hard to know what's what as people use different cards, different builds, different fps - 24 or 25 - and the list goes on...).

Good idea, I'll contribute. Problem is, if our resolutuons change again we'll have to keep it updated constantly.

[1%]

@robbe

C'mon... read... sraw can't be changed from canon menus.

[Robbe]

C'mon... read... sraw can't be changed from canon menus.

What do you mean with "C´mon...read..."?
And how to get back the settings for image quality when using Canon 600D without ML?

[1%]

You don't... its not a valid mode. But if you look at posts earlier in this thread the issue is discussed ad nauseum.

[AriLG]

Problem is, if our resolutuons change again we'll have to keep it updated constantly.

Exactly. that's why a chart is necessary. there are way too many variables and if we want to help each other finding the sweet spot on each given moment (without going through a long trail and error process) this is the place.

We will have to give our : TL version (date), our cards , formatted cards : yes/no , resolution on ML RAW, aspect ratio... anything that COUNTS... (including settings in the canon menu) and - of course -  frame count. for example, in some cases I was able to reach higher number of frame count from what users were saying here, and on some others cases - lower count.

[1%]

Should be unlocked height and the multiples from now on, unless you find a res/aspect I really need to add.