raw workflow thread would be nice
I also figured out why my video had magenta cast - it was just preview issue - not using correct LUT
But looking at magicraw created dng in Adobe - image looks fine but is listed by Adobe as 8bit
Now for what is captured anyway (should be in another thread?):
Since 2Mpixel frame is taking up 4Mbytes - that would imply 16bit per pixel (14/16 of which is data?) - can someone outline the detailed mapping of sensor bayer elements to data in the DNG file?
There is a claim that Canon 5Dmk3 'photosites' for 1920x1080 recording use 9 bayer elements (as below) to get one 'pixel'
GBG
RGR
GBG
http://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/2696-big-news-hands-on-with-continuous-raw-recording-on-canon-5d-mark-iii/page-6But their selection of 9 elements does not seem right in their diagram (some would be almost only red info).
what exactly does magic lantern code do to read the sensor and generate 14bits of what per pixel?
Or is magic lantern just reading alternating bayer elements - so that we actually have 14 bits of information in a 16 bit datum at 1024K of green, 512K of red and 512K of blue - 960x540x2 true green resolution, 960x540 true blue resolution, 960x540 true red resolution.
So spatial resolution should be 1K by 1K?
Where Adobe CS4 (for example) is debayering (what algorithm) and interpolating to 1920x1080 at 24bpp RGB (all derived not actual)
and preview just dumped to screen - not sure how that added up to magenta

So using 9 'bayer elements' to get 1 'pixel' seems like it would be higher spatial and color resolution than simple alternating R/B rows and */G columns.
Any Canon / ML experts that can explain what goes into a ML raw video pixel for 5DMK3? Is it using Canon algorithm to derive pixels or bypassing it? I am guessing bypassing it.
And is it different algorithm for crop mode versus subsample of full sensor? Some people are saying crop is sharper - is that accurate?
Guess it is impossible to read whole sensor and debayer on the fly - that would be a weighted convolution operation and too much cpu on camera?
Higher end Canon for cinema does something like that, right?