Ok... I got it now. My mistake! I had the docutils-0.12 allright but they weren't properly installed. Going into the docutils directory and issuing "sudo python setup.py install" did the trick. Nothing special for most of you I guess, but my knowledge of Linux has gone REALLY rusty. So I put it here for my own recollection.
I can now compile 60D.111 ZIP just fine, with 12 modules inside the archive. My day is good! :-)
Now, as for what I was thinking of contributing; I would like to have a bit of feedback on feasability and usefulness.
So, my idea was to automatically bracket a dual-iso shoot into 2 or 3 shoots. For the purpose of (maybe) add even more quality in post. Like restoring some of the lost vertical resolution and reducing the aliasing/moire effect.
1) The 2 bracket would be a dual-iso followed by a reverse dual-iso. So, if the normal does 100/800, the second would do 800/100. I might get this completely wrong, but would this allow to restore some of the lost resolution in post? I'm here assuming you shoot from a tripod so that both shots can be more or less overlayed. And since the loss of vertical resolution is introduced by missing line information, can I assume that both shots will hold eachother's missing pieces?
2) The triple bracket would be a dual-iso followed by a shot with the base iso and one with the recovery iso. The thinking here is more or less the same.
Now, I KNOW that the strength of dual-iso is that you can have low noise in just one shot, thus eliminating the problem of moving objects. But in landscape photography this is not usually an issue. I'm basically hinting at classic HDR, but without some of the flaws.
Would any of this be useful/feasable?
