7D raw was a lot more stable back then [late 2016]. I don't have this kind of stability anymore.
Old builds are still available; if you can identify a regression,
please do a proper bug report.
In particular, since 2016, the main builds received almost exclusively bug fixes on the raw recording side (
look at the changes). In particular, for video, the relevant changes since September 16 2016 (15eb9aa) are:
- mlv_rec: RAWC metadata, minor file I/O fix, minor speed tweak (round MLV header to 512 bytes), version metadata
- raw_rec -> mlv_lite
- file I/O backend: fixed an important bug that resulted in invalid video files (like 1 bad video out of a few hundreds)
- raw backend: use the same raw type for all cameras, autodetect resolution rather than hardcoding it, raw capture info (pixel binning factors), preview fixes.
Even when going back to January 2016, the only relevant changes (between f87b759 and 15eb9aa) are:
- mlv_rec: fixed pink frames, wrong black level, crop offsets, added RAWC metadata, refactored powersave, blocked the zoom key while recording
- mlv_snd: persistent settings, show audio meters when recording sound (and hide them when not recording)
- raw backend: black/white level fixes.
That was all on the raw recording side. Notable new features that landed in mainline in this period: Lua scripting, advanced intervalometer, 5D3.123, 700D.115, Makefile updates, various refactors, benchmarks/tests moved to modules, submenu icons, various minor updates.
Given the above, I'm very surprised about your comment ("I don't have this kind of stability anymore."), so please report the issue properly.
BTW, noticed you have been trying the 10/12-bit builds. I hope you are not talking about them - are you aware these builds are not present on the download page, not even as experimental builds, for the 7D? There is a reason for that

How is the 2.0.6 build?
I have absolutely no idea - the current feedback doesn't allow me to draw a conclusion. Are you aware that we are relying on user feedback?