« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Looks interesting  (Read 1600 times)

garry23

  • Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2218
Looks interesting
« on: October 27, 2020, 06:14:11 PM »
Logged

Ant123

  • Contributor
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 182
Re: Looks interesting
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2020, 10:47:18 PM »
Logged

garry23

  • Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2218
Re: Looks interesting
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2020, 11:03:21 PM »
Missed that post  :) ;) :D ;D >:( :( :o 8) ??? ::) :P :-[
Logged

theBilalFakhouri

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1272
  • UHS-I
Re: Looks interesting
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2020, 11:25:40 PM »
Some days ago I shared this video on Discord server:

a1ex replies were exciting:

Quote
"should be doable without external motors, and with a less expensive sensor
https://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=23739.0
https://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=4997.0
you still need a way to get the distance sensor data into ML (possible via USB for example, but there may be other ways)"

Original messages on Discord:
https://discord.com/channels/671072748985909258/756922555532837024/766227505056186368

Lidar contacting directly to lens motors via USB connection using ML, that maybe would work with STM lens (with loop focus ring).
Logged

garry23

  • Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2218
Re: Looks interesting
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2020, 07:53:05 AM »
One thing to think about is the resolution you can get using the two approaches.

That is driving the lens from inside, ie using the ML or Canon code vs rotating the lens externally via an add on device.

Just a thought.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »