5DmkIII 10bit 1080pRAW 60fps - NightLights

Started by pakobagur, January 23, 2017, 03:06:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pakobagur

Camera: 5DmkIII
Lens: Mir-1B 2.8/37mm
MagicLantern version: magiclantern-crop3x.2017Jan13.5D3123
Shot at 60fps and 10bit
I hope you like it,
Thanks for watching.



pako bagur
http://pakobagur.com

D_Odell

Great choice of choosing M42 lenses! So particular soft and dreamy! But with dreamy stuff like that I would use stabilization, Warp or so. Best, David
5D3 [size=6pt](OLPF removed)[/size] :: 1.1.3 :: Canon FD L Serie

hjfilmspeed

Hello! Excellent color! Question, was this stretched in post?

Oh wait 1x1 mode, you didn't have to stretch. Sorry I didn't see that!

MAG


Nice video !

I would like to ask you, how did you adjust your 5Dm3 to slowmo without stretch ?

pakobagur

Hi,
Thanks for the kind comments.

This was shot full frame at 1920x648 and then stretched 167% vertically in post.

I had my camera set to 1280x60fps in the Canon menu. No crop, FPS override at 60fps, 10bpp, and 1920x648 resolution inside MagicLantern. This way I managed to record around 10 to 12 seconds of continuous footage in my old and trusty Komputerbay 1000x CFcard, before it stopped recording because of a dropped frame.

I used the crop3x build from the Experiments page, because it's the only one with the option of 10bpp recording for the 5DmkIII 1.2.3 (AFAIK, I might be wrong).

The ability to record at 10bpp is awesome, file size is much more manageable inside the camera, and quality wise I was quite impressed, and I didn't have any problems with it. I used the latest version of mlv_dump from the Utilities page.

Quote from: D_Odell on January 23, 2017, 01:14:09 PM
But with dreamy stuff like that I would use stabilization, Warp or so.

I totally agree that I should have warpStabilized all those shots.

Thanks again!


pako bagur
http://pakobagur.com

RenatoPhoto

There is something strange.. the maximum (usable) height of 60 fps and 1920 x 632.  It records at 1920x672 but there is a black border above making it usable only 1920x632.
This film shown at "full screen" has a dimension of 1920x800 (aprox).  So I suspect that they actually cropped the 1920x672 in the center to 1516 x 632 and then stretched to 1920x800.

Oopps:  ha ha the explanation was posted while I was typing.. I guess I was right..  Looks pretty cool!

edit: Just to clarify.. I thought that he had scaled from a crop recording but according to the explanation above he has just done a vertical stretch which means he did not use any crop and therefore the recording was not a 1:1.
http://www.pululahuahostal.com  |  EF 300 f/4, EF 100-400 L, EF 180 L, EF-S 10-22, Samyang 14mm, Sigma 28mm EX DG, Sigma 8mm 1:3.5 EX DG, EF 50mm 1:1.8 II, EF 1.4X II, Kenko C-AF 2X

hjfilmspeed

Oh wow okay I was wrong! This looked really great! It didn't look stretched. Well Done