Thanks, I'm still pretty new to posting. Sorry for putting this in the wrong spot.
I just ran a test with a similar methodology as the one I linked in my above post (
http://www.cameramemoryspeed.com/canon-7d-mark-ii/fastest-sd-cf-card-comparison/)
I ran a burst of RAW files(RAW only, no JPEG) in high speed mode with the lens cap on and manual focus engaged. I measured the time from when the red "activity" light was on until it turned off after the burst completed. Note that I stopped capturing images before the buffer filled each time so the capture rate doesn't slow down.
I ran a few tests with somewhat mixed results. If anyone can make any recommendations on improving my process, I'm open for suggestions.
RAW file size is consistent at 22.0MB per image It looks like the RAW file gets bigger and results get worse as ISO goes up. I guess this makes sense? For the sake of this test I manually set ISO to 100, F2.8, 1/200 shutter speed.
Test 1:
- 17 images
- 6.28 seconds from start to activity light off
- 374MB total captured
- 59.55MB/s avg write speed
Test 2:
- 17 images
- 6.06 seconds from start to activity light off
- 374MB total captured
- 61.7MB/s avg write speed
Test 3:
- 25 images
- 8.33 seconds from start to activity light off
- 550MB total captured
- 66MB/s avg write speed
Test 4:
- 30 images
- 9.81 seconds from start to activity light off
- 660MB total captured
- 67.28MB/s avg write speed
I feel like it's already been pretty well established, but If anyone's got a 70D and a sufficiently fast card and wants to try out the same test I'd be interested to see the results.
It looks like these results are slower than the ones published for the 7D MK II in my linked benchmark. But I can't say for sure if that ~10MB/s difference is a result of my testing process being flawed or a hardware difference.