Neat Video tests on RAW footage

Started by beauchampy, October 13, 2014, 09:52:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KurtAugust

www.kurtaugustyns.com @HetRovendOog

SiSS

2016, Neat Video still relevant for MLV and Premiere Pro CC?

beauchampy

Quote from: SiSS on February 02, 2016, 01:22:05 AM
2016, Neat Video still relevant for MLV and Premiere Pro CC?

For sure! I still use it on every production.

Lakwaun

Hmm. Just doing some reading as I shot a raw video and it turned out with a lot of noise after converting it.
My question is about work flow... Neat video does work good but it takes to long to render and I am good at Adobe Camera Raw. Which is the best workflow for say music videos.
Im going to learn Davinci before trying or buying it but is it really better then After Effects or can really both achieve good results.
Just wondering also when people denoise say using neat video, then color correct and sharpen (using unsharpened mask I presume) do people usually export that out into a uncompressed video format, then start editing? I always use dynamic link since i have already chopped up multiple sequences into one using multi cam applying neat video on each prepared sequenced scene.
Is that why my renders take so long? Is there a easier way beside im sure the not working way like adding one instance of neat video over the main sequence in a adjustment layer or something.

beauchampy

Quote from: Lakwaun on February 08, 2016, 11:35:03 PM
Hmm. Just doing some reading as I shot a raw video and it turned out with a lot of noise after converting it.
My question is about work flow... Neat video does work good but it takes to long to render and I am good at Adobe Camera Raw. Which is the best workflow for say music videos.
Im going to learn Davinci before trying or buying it but is it really better then After Effects or can really both achieve good results.
Just wondering also when people denoise say using neat video, then color correct and sharpen (using unsharpened mask I presume) do people usually export that out into a uncompressed video format, then start editing? I always use dynamic link since i have already chopped up multiple sequences into one using multi cam applying neat video on each prepared sequenced scene.
Is that why my renders take so long? Is there a easier way beside im sure the not working way like adding one instance of neat video over the main sequence in a adjustment layer or something.

It's processor intensive, so you want to avoid denoising your rushes.

My workflow (Resolve) is this:

1. Convert DNG's to ProRes Proxy in Resolve
2. Edit the video in Premiere
3. Export XML from Premiere
4. Open XML in Resolve, linking to original DNG files (we're not working on the Proxies any more) your edit will now show in Resolve
5. De-noise and grade each shot individually.
6. Export finished video from Resolve.