Komputerbay 1066x series just released

Started by pobox, April 11, 2014, 02:09:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Markus

Updated with Benchmark of my 1066x card!  :D

Quote from: Markus on May 20, 2014, 07:11:48 PM
Benchmark of my 1200x card for comparison:

Liveview off


Liveview on


Benchmark of my 1066x card:

Liveview off


Liveview on


pobox

I am starting to get corrupted frames with these cards, both the 64gb and 256gb.
Im using the 5d3 on 1.2.3 with ml build 16th of april.

In almost evry shot i get a few pink lines in a single frame. they are all horizontal on diffrent positions.
I will upload a few frames later

I got the corrupted frames after copying the files via usb3 cardreader to usb seagate expansion Hard drive. MLV Files on the cards seems to be fine though. I will start another topic on this subject.

slicKrox

Quote from: Markus on June 01, 2014, 11:17:23 PM
Updated with Benchmark of my 1066x card!  :D
Hy Markus, 1066x you used 64 or 128gb? Thanks.

Markus


slicKrox

256gb out of my budget :) I have one 64gb card, but with my shooting style, its not enough, especially when I'm traveling. I seen some good benchmarks from Komputerbay 1066x cards. Somebody mentioned, that 64gb is faster, but 128gb for slightly higher price - very tempting. Probably the best decision would be: to get two of them and to keep best one :)

Markus

As you say the 128gb cards have been known to be slower. I'm not sure if this applyes to the cards in 1066x series as well. I don't have any experience of 128gb 1066x cards.

jimmyD30

I just ordered 2 KB 64GB 1066x CF cards, I'll post results for 5DM3 once I get them.

WagnerWerneck

I use 2 64GB Komputerbay 1000x to record 1920x1080 at 24fps with my 5Dm3 with no problem, if I try 30fps I get drop frame in 3 seconds or less, and I want to buy mode CF cards, does any one knows if the 1050x or 1066x Komputerbay cards are really faster then 1000x?  If it is possible to record 30fps?  Thanks

jimmyD30

Komputerbay 64GB 1066x CF on Canon 5D3.123 @ 24fps


rawvideo

I got two 128GB cards, one 1055 and one 1066, both are at 85MBs in writing. Thats 1920x1080 with 25fps and sound stable so far.

But its not the advertised speed of the card. For slow motion shots it would be great to get a faster one, haven't decided yet if i should order some more for testing.

Markus

The 128gb cards are not as stable as 64gb and 256gb versions for some unknown reason...

rawvideo

But the 128 ist the best value for the price both 64 and 256 cost more per GB.

I guess no one has seen a 5DM3 writing more than 100MBs but it would be great to max out my cameras capabilities with the memory card.

rawvideo

This is so annoying, the 64GB cards are almost as expensive as the 128GB. And if they actually are faster I would only use them for high frame rate stuff since my 128GB card works fine for normal 25 frames 1080p.

But the high frame rate stuff of course needs more space. So I wouldn't get much onto the smaller card.

DeafEyeJedi

Maybe it's just me but I've been a happy camper with these KB 128gb 1066x cards that I've been using on my 5D3 the past several months.

I can get continuous 24,25p 1080p in MLV w sound.

30p with slightly less resolution ( 1920x1038 ) to get continuous in MLV w sound. (otherwise I can push it to 2-3 minutes (about 2200-2500+ frames) before dropped frames @ full 1080p)

This was all done with HaCKeD preview enabled.

Also be sure your cards are in exFAT!  ;D
5D3.113 | 5D3.123 | EOSM.203 | 7D.203 | 70D.112 | 100D.101 | EOSM2.* | 50D.109

rawvideo

If you have the time, what seq. write speed do you get with CrystalDiskMark on your 128gb card?

DeafEyeJedi

sorry @rawvideo -- I'm not on Windows... Only on Mac and I have done Benchmarks on it severals weeks ago as well.

Feel free to check it out... (though BM was done with Oct 7th build at the time)

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=12630.msg133459#msg133459

Not sure if a new BM test with latest nightly would actually make a difference?

@a1ex -- worth to try?
5D3.113 | 5D3.123 | EOSM.203 | 7D.203 | 70D.112 | 100D.101 | EOSM2.* | 50D.109

rawvideo

Just tried my second Komputerbay 128GB 1066x. Its also not faster than my 1050 128GB Komputerbay.

It also doesnt go beyond 1920x1080 25fps  and 1600x560 with 50fps in continuous recording.

DeafEyeJedi

How could the 1050x be faster than 1066x?

Did you BM both of them in your camera?

Are you using the 5D3 as well?

If so, which firmware are you currently using?
5D3.113 | 5D3.123 | EOSM.203 | 7D.203 | 70D.112 | 100D.101 | EOSM2.* | 50D.109

rawvideo

Yes 5D3 with 123.

Its not faster, the first 1066 card I got was the same speed as the 1050 I got before that.

I benchmark with CrystalDiskMark on the PC. Actually that newest 1066 card is 4 Mbit faster than the first. But the first 1066 was as fast as the 1050 (84 MBit seq writing)..also 1050 and 1066 isn't that big a difference. Still these cards are advertised with a 100Mbit writing speed.

In the camera I only check if get to record continuously in a higher resolution (thats all that matters) in comparison to the other card.

DeafEyeJedi

@rawvideo -- What's the highest MB/s  you can push on your 5D3 w the KB 128gb 1066x?
5D3.113 | 5D3.123 | EOSM.203 | 7D.203 | 70D.112 | 100D.101 | EOSM2.* | 50D.109

rawvideo

Well the internal Benchmark with everything (GD, Liveview) off shows this:


QuoteBenchmark complete.
ML Nightly.2014Rug07.5D3123, ffdld533b1dc (5D3-123) tip
Mode: playback, Global Draw: OFF
CF MI Corporation SILICONMOTION SM2236RB
Write speed (buffer=16384k): 118.8 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=16384k):   152.8 MB/s
Write speed (buffer=16384k): 114.9 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=16384k):   152.8 MB/s
Write speed (buffer=15625k): 119.5 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=15625k):   152.9 MB/s
Write speed (buffer=4096k): 112.4 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=4096k):   141.1 MB/s
Write speed (buffer=3906k): 181.8 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=3906k):   139.2 MB/s
Write speed (buffer=2048k): 183.8 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=2048k):   128.8 MB/s
Write speed (buffer=1953k): 87.6 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=1953k):   123.9 MB/s
Write speed (buffer=128k): 32.4 MB/s
Read speed (buffer=128k):   34.9 MB/s

DeafEyeJedi

I meant during recording... like take a snapshot of your 5D3 while recording either RAW or MLV... (hence Raw can push to higher MB/s than MLV)

For example: 5D3 (1.1.3) RAW Crop-Mode (HaCKeD preview) @ 30fps (FPS Override to 25p) -- This one is pushing @ 109.6 MB/s with a KB 128gb 1066x card...



Do you think mine card is just as bad as yours if not the same?
5D3.113 | 5D3.123 | EOSM.203 | 7D.203 | 70D.112 | 100D.101 | EOSM2.* | 50D.109

rawvideo

I dont see the use of this, that number is always changing. So that wouldn't be very accurate.

Also no significant difference between MLV and Raw for me. Both do 7 seconds of 1920x672 50fps.

DeafEyeJedi

sure it is (depending on settings) always changing within that range is still pretty darn good for a cheap fast card as far as I'm concerned.

If you want more... try testing out the KB 256gb 1200x series?

I haven't so I can't speak for that.

correct me if I'm wrong.
5D3.113 | 5D3.123 | EOSM.203 | 7D.203 | 70D.112 | 100D.101 | EOSM2.* | 50D.109

draco

Edit: nevermind this was my HD DOH!

Just got this card yesterday; benchmark looks too fast, any settings I should check? Its a Komputerbay 1066x 32GB. Used a Kingston FCR-HS3 USB3.0 reader.