Server moved to new hardware. Should be faster and is cheaper on top.
Its not finished for 5DIII yet even. Wait till its out and testable there at least.
Yea, that hasn't been released on my end so I haven't been able to try it or see what/why is broken.
Yea, that hasn't been released on my end so I haven't been able to try it or see what/why is broken.Tried the rawdiag module and only get the white level and blank graph but no error.The dark frame works but I can't take a screenshot in the QR screen.
-40, -44, -46, -45, -44, -49, -55, -58
Ok, ran it on random stuff so its probably not calibrated right. The first actual ISO was 42. I'll do it properly and see what happens.
The first actual ISO was 42.
just be sure to blow *all* channels sky high.
delta.gain = -100calibrated.gain.100 = -100calibrated.gain.800 = -124calibrated.gain.3200 = -52
delta.gain = -121calibrated.gain.100 = -36calibrated.gain.200 = -33calibrated.gain.400 = -39calibrated.gain.800 = -41calibrated.gain.1600 = -43calibrated.gain.3200 = -52calibrated.gain.6400 = -3calibrated.gain.12800 = -121
Optical black:
Still looks a bit funky. I wouldn't expect ISO 200 to have a lower negative gain value (although I don't have a large sample base to compare from), and ISOs 6400-12800 look completely borked.
If you guys are getting borked results from the optical black, I'd say that's where your problem would be.The source for raw_diag is here.
But how do you use it
One has to diagnose raw_update_params() from raw.c and see why it's returning 0. That's the cause of "Raw error" from raw_diag.You can define RAW_DEBUG in raw.c, which will print a bunch of debug messages. These may give some clues.This problem affects 6D and 600D so far.