I have been resisting the pull of dual iso since day 1 because I have always been happy with the results of gain reduction at iso 200 and the benefit of not dealing with all the issues surrounding dual iso...
But, after a shot yesterday that just didn't cut it, I decided to try again today with dual, and it won!
Now, to be totally clear, in this comparison, the iso200 version was without gain reduction (i was too lazy to change magic lantern versions) but in practice, canon 200 (only 200) is _almost_ as good as gain reduction, so it could have been a little better, plus it would be at 3072 instead of 1920, but even so, dual would win, clearly.
I lifted the shadows only to the point where the single iso was still marginally acceptable, but the dual version could go MUCH higher with no problems. It's the champion!
So, I am going to start using this today... I only hope it works reliably, and at 24 fps without too much nonsense.
Keep up the amazing work, I'm a believer!
But, after a shot yesterday that just didn't cut it, I decided to try again today with dual, and it won!
Now, to be totally clear, in this comparison, the iso200 version was without gain reduction (i was too lazy to change magic lantern versions) but in practice, canon 200 (only 200) is _almost_ as good as gain reduction, so it could have been a little better, plus it would be at 3072 instead of 1920, but even so, dual would win, clearly.
I lifted the shadows only to the point where the single iso was still marginally acceptable, but the dual version could go MUCH higher with no problems. It's the champion!
So, I am going to start using this today... I only hope it works reliably, and at 24 fps without too much nonsense.
Keep up the amazing work, I'm a believer!