@BBA/@A1ex
I'm away from home at the moment, but watching your developments with much interest.
As I alluded to before, as a stills (non-macro) photographer, this feature would be a nice to have, but non essential for me.
My Lua landscape bracketing scripts operate with a move from here-2-here rationale, ie FP2Inf, FP2HFD or FPa2FPb, and based on checking that overlap from the ML DoF variabes, eg DoF-near and -far.
As I overlap the focus brackets, being a few% out is not that critical.
Thus, I wonder, if the lens repeatably or linearalization gets 'better' between focus points, ie rather than trying to drive the lens over the entire possible movement capability.
Just a thought?
Cheers
Garry
I'm away from home at the moment, but watching your developments with much interest.
As I alluded to before, as a stills (non-macro) photographer, this feature would be a nice to have, but non essential for me.
My Lua landscape bracketing scripts operate with a move from here-2-here rationale, ie FP2Inf, FP2HFD or FPa2FPb, and based on checking that overlap from the ML DoF variabes, eg DoF-near and -far.
As I overlap the focus brackets, being a few% out is not that critical.
Thus, I wonder, if the lens repeatably or linearalization gets 'better' between focus points, ie rather than trying to drive the lens over the entire possible movement capability.
Just a thought?
Cheers
Garry