Sorry if this post is already present - I'm not able to find a similar posting:
I accidentally left the dual_iso function set for most of my shots which was for a very important anniversary celebration. With the help of wine, I was able to process them to DNGs using cr2hdr.exe. The pictures look fine and no different than any of the other pictures I took without this setting. Some have a high dynamic range and others do not but I was hoping to take advantage of this accident and show improved pictures for those with the high dynamic range. So I took the shots with the same exposure setting as I would normally use (without the dual_iso setting). I was wondering if I have done exactly what I'm supposed to do with "wine cr2hdr.exe [files]" or is there an extra step I'm supposed to take? The processing got rid of the lines which I"m assuming are the dual iso settings but there are still over-exposed and under-exposed portions of the image.
Also, is there a linux alternative I should be using?
I'm post-processing using Darktable.
Cheers
Richard
I accidentally left the dual_iso function set for most of my shots which was for a very important anniversary celebration. With the help of wine, I was able to process them to DNGs using cr2hdr.exe. The pictures look fine and no different than any of the other pictures I took without this setting. Some have a high dynamic range and others do not but I was hoping to take advantage of this accident and show improved pictures for those with the high dynamic range. So I took the shots with the same exposure setting as I would normally use (without the dual_iso setting). I was wondering if I have done exactly what I'm supposed to do with "wine cr2hdr.exe [files]" or is there an extra step I'm supposed to take? The processing got rid of the lines which I"m assuming are the dual iso settings but there are still over-exposed and under-exposed portions of the image.
Also, is there a linux alternative I should be using?
I'm post-processing using Darktable.
Cheers
Richard