Hello, I would like to export files to some losless format like tiff or dng. How can I do it? I changed "jpeg" in bat to "tiff" but it didn't change anything.
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: DavidSh on May 08, 2014, 07:42:48 PM
Simple and short answer - No.
Best
David.
Quote from: Luiz Roberto dos Santos on March 08, 2014, 01:08:59 AM
It is a RAW engine, like a ACR, but open sourceand better: https://www.rawtherapee.com
Quote from: ted ramasola on March 07, 2014, 09:49:04 PM
This is a side by side crop of the chart shot at 2048 x 930.
If you use resolve's default sharpening it makes you "see" a perception of more aliasing but in fact it enhances the edges and make it seem so. Resolve has a high default sharpening so lower it just as you would in acr.
Contrast settings also increase the preception of different aliasing behavior between the same image.
Quote from: Ronn on February 22, 2014, 01:58:10 PM
Hello,
I just started using the ML hack and I'm bit confused at the results I'm getting. I have the 600D, 50mbps 32GB SD card. I'm running into two issues. When set to the lowest resolution, I'm still getting the error code "recording stopped automaticlly" and my footage is either extremely zoomed in or excessively cropped. Can someone post a simple check list for the best working settings for this camera? I'm sure that I'm just overlooking something.
Thanks!
Quote from: escho on February 11, 2014, 10:19:39 PMCheck twice, I assure you you'd have much more noise with RT. I use up to date ML nightlies (no TL) and newest RT.
No problem with 600D and rawtherapee here. But I prefer to use darktable.
Edgar
Quote from: dmilligan on February 12, 2014, 12:08:52 AM
I also have no idea what you mean, please define "horizontal squeezing" mathematically or with pseudo-code. How exactly do you get from 1280 to 1000? throw away some pixels (aka line skipping, or in this case 'column' skipping)? bilinear interpolation? magic?
I have never seen a "squeezing" option anywhere
Quote from: tupp
However, you are setting a horizontally oblong pixel aspect ratio in your camera, while setting the same pixel aspect ratio somewhere in post.
Quote from: tupp on February 12, 2014, 12:14:00 AM
I think that I am beginning to understand what you want. "Squeezing" during shooting and "expanding" in post are misnomers.
What you actually seem to be proposing is to change the aspect ratio of the pixel so that there are fewer pixels on the horizontal axis. This would create, effectively, rectangular pixels which are longer on the horizontal axis.
If so, there probably would have to be some sort of pixel binning or pixel skipping of the raw data done within the camera.
Quote from: chmee on February 11, 2014, 11:10:59 PM
There's no room for subtracting/cropping/dividing/skipping raw-data, because there's no "processing-unit" between sensor-output and memory-controller - thus, i'd say, not possible - but a1ex and the masters of hardware should tell us..
regards chmee
Quote from: tupp on February 11, 2014, 10:43:43 PM
I am fairly sure that ML/TL users are already doing this.
As I understand it, in the instances in which it is possible to use ML/TL to change the aspect ratio to more of a 4:3 or square format, one can sometimes increase the actual vertical resolution (to higher than 720) while using anamorphic optics (oriented horizontally), so as to get a greater effective resolution overall.
Quote from: Midphase on February 11, 2014, 10:31:42 PM
I don't understand what you're asking.
Quote from: Luiz Roberto dos Santos on February 10, 2014, 02:16:30 PM
Can up. some sample?
Page created in 0.101 seconds with 13 queries.