Quote from: bpv5P on August 15, 2017, 01:00:30 PM
There's no proof, any tests (that I'm aware of), showing that Cinelog-C is better than free alternatives.
I do not claim MLVProducer is more precise and I'm not affiliated with any people or product. I just can't see how it's different from AlexaLog, since the author itself said Cinelog-C is based on it. Note that Cinelog-C is paid, while AlexaLog is not. I don't want people spreading false information just to sell it's product here.
This place should be a community without astroturfing and without marketing people trying to fool others. I'm not against selling anything here, just say it explicitly.
I'm not saying Andy600 is one of those people (yet). What I'm asking for (on the other thread) is to prove it. And, as I have said in this thread, I'll be one of the folks (like you) that advocate for Cinelog-C if it really proves to have perceptible advantages. I have no problem admitting I was wrong and apologize.
Well, why not buy it and try it?
Athough we may not have posted the results of the tests, there are reasons why numerous ML users for years now have been advising that Cinelog through ACR offers the best image quality available of all the post workflow options.
These have to do with dynamic range preservation, noise suppression and reproduction of pleasing colour.
But why should we test this for you? If you're not willng to cough up the money to do your own tests, then please stop banging on about it.