Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - hdclip

#26
Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: Pomfort ClipHouse
January 22, 2014, 01:59:11 PM
Quote from: hjfilmspeed on January 22, 2014, 05:18:10 AM
Expensive? compared to LR, ACR from PS, or AE its decent IMO...............ahhhhh WINDOWS PLEASE!...Sorry couldnt help myself it. It looks so fun and simple. And the potential to handle native ML RAW. Awesome!
? ? ? ? ? ?
#27
Hello!!is there a tool like PomfortCliphouse but for Windows????????
Thank´s!!!!!!!!
#28
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 19, 2013, 10:45:18 AM
Quote from: ddp on December 19, 2013, 12:34:46 AM
Cheers mate, many thanks! Only one thing, what build/setup are you using?

2/12/2013...;)
#29
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 18, 2013, 09:32:12 PM
Quote from: ddp on December 18, 2013, 07:43:47 PM

You mean continous? and at 50p?

Yes I have continous, it goes to 2min at 1928X972 25fps without problem's..but with 50P I have around 10 15 sec at max resolution without crop...
#30
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 18, 2013, 09:59:58 AM
Quote from: ddp on December 18, 2013, 02:23:02 AM
Hi guys, how is the best cf card to record continous raw with the 7d? Appart of the komputerbay, maybe the lexar 1000x or the scandisk extreme pro 160mps?

Thanks in advance  :)
I have the Lexar 1000X and work's fine 1728X972. 25Fps
#31
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 04, 2013, 11:05:51 AM
I'm sorry, not my intention...I only expose a problem that I think is important...But if this forum is only for developers may be you must to select better the incription of the people.
Thank's and sorry again.
#32
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 04, 2013, 10:14:30 AM
There is no  way for me to do 50 fps, always the frame is Deformed...regardless of the aspect ratio...:(
#33
Thank's!!!!!
#34
Ok... :'( ... And now, one stupid question, the indicator of the Ml speed is Megabyte or Megabit??? ;D
And the CF is Megabyte or Megabit???
#35
Quote from: bnvm on December 03, 2013, 05:18:16 PM
Not sure exactly where the bottleneck on the 5D2 is, but the writing limit seems to be around 75 MB/s. That limit is due to the hardware of the camera so faster cards won't do any good.
But with this teory the lexar 800x must be work fine at 1880, and it seems that the camera cant go up 40Mb/seg...(in my camera)
?????
#36
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 03, 2013, 08:16:38 PM
Quote from: arrinkiiii on December 03, 2013, 12:09:30 PM
Thanks hdclip  :D   ...but i want to try the new build, from yesterday  :D


For what i remember, you change in the canon menu and then change in ML menu the fps and lock the fps... Wend i try it i did this and everything went alright.
Yes but the aspect ratio doesnt found ok...if you put 16/9 is not really 16/9, you must to crop on post... littlebit confusion... :-[
#37
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 03, 2013, 11:07:25 AM
Anyone know how to set the recording to 50fps, if I change the settings to canon 1280X720 50fps and 50 fps magic all right but as for the aspect ratio becomes crazy
#38
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 03, 2013, 11:04:25 AM
Quote from: arrinkiiii on December 03, 2013, 10:24:52 AM
http://tl.bot-fly.com/   it's again down??
Yes is Down...if you need the last 28Nov, I can give you....
#39
Quote from: SpcCb on December 03, 2013, 12:59:19 AM
+1 with reddeercity.

Plus, I can say I never saw a 5D2 recording continuous in 16/9 RAW 1880px at 25, 24 or 23.976fps, even with a 160MB/s CF card.

Maybe with a 800x it should be continuous in 2.35 AR with 1880px at 23.976fps. I use this config with a Sandisk CF 60MB/s.
Thank you very much this magicworld and their people is amazing,  but the problem with the 5D is the buffer or the processor???what do you think???
#40
Quote from: reddeercity on December 02, 2013, 07:35:04 PM
800x cards are to SLOW to record that frame size
Best you can get is 1872x930
1000x cards is min. For full
16:9 or even 1.85:1 at 1880,1872
You will be able to record 1728x768
16:9 (I think that the size)
The max size I record on my 5D2 @ 16:9
Is 1880x1058 @23.976 for about 700-1000 frame.
For continuous recording I use Lexar 1000x 32,64GB
For frame size in non crop mode 1872x1012,
And in crop mode 2048x930 both at 23.976.

This is on the Oct. 24th built from A.D.
Do not use the nightly built for the 5D2
As it dose not work every well (slows do the camera & crashes)
The only that stable right now is Oct24th built.
I use it for Paid work, and keep away from
The MLV format right now it kills the camera performances
It total useless on the 5D Mark2, it really only works
On the 5D3
Thankyou Very Much!!!!!!I will try... ;)
#41
Quote from: PressureFM on December 02, 2013, 06:01:53 PM
Benchmark the Lexar 800x CompactFlash card in ML. It may not be fast enough at your chosen resolution.
also have a 7D and I have not this problem, configure the 7D I turned more difficult by the issue of autostart but I can record 2 minutes, in contrast with the 5D I can not even two seconds ... I think something happens because 120mb/seg..., need to configure the card in a special way, any special formatting or something??
#42
Quote from: SpcCb on December 02, 2013, 04:59:30 PM
hdclip > What's the target FPS?
24 or 25, with booth the same Result...when start record and arrives to +/-27mb/seg stop recording...and before to start record in the Magic menu said with this resolution only expecteed 140 frames...
It isnt normal, really???
#43
Hello!!!!I can make only 2 Seconds in 1880 Raw 16/9 on my 5D MKII, I have the latest build and a 800X Lexar 16GB...Does anyone tell how I must to prepare my CF or my camera to have continious record´s????I have apple computer...
Thankyou very much!!!!!
#44
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
December 02, 2013, 03:27:52 PM
Quote from: DFM on December 02, 2013, 01:49:00 PM
X-Rite's ColorChecker products come with their own profiling software. Normally people use it as a Lr plugin but it runs in standalone mode, you feed it any untouched DNG that shows the card and it spits out an ICC profile; which you can then apply to the ML DNG sequence through the Camera Calibration panel in ACR.
Ok, Thank´s!!!!!!! ;)
#45
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
November 30, 2013, 04:54:16 PM
Quote from: DFM on November 30, 2013, 11:23:28 AM
Provided it's audible, i.e. the camera is in range, and you're only using one camera.

Slating each scene is much easier and can lock any number of cameras to any number of audio tracks. It has a bunch of other advantages that matter for RAW shooting (shot info on screen, whibal targets, etc.). Stick a ColorChecker card to the slate and you have everything you need to match footage from different cameras, as you can dump that DNG frame into XRite's software and create a color profile that normalizes each clip.
Hello!!!!I would like to know, wich XRITE do you use to create color profile???thank's!!!
#46
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
November 29, 2013, 11:27:21 AM
#47
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
November 28, 2013, 08:35:56 PM
Quote from: javyelow on November 28, 2013, 05:36:01 PM
Mi first raw video test!

colored with davinci resolve

nice results for me!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqsoWSkqoUQ
Hola Javier!!!!esta guapo el test...!!!!por fin hablar un poco en cristiano...jejeje
Oye, para el tema correccion de detalle y ruido, el Resolve te va bien???yo es que no consigo dejar de usar el Ligthroom o Photoshop, me da que el Resolve y el Magiclantern RAW todavia no se entienden del todo bien no???otra cosa que me impulso a decidirme por el otro Workflow fue los espacios de color y Gamma, aunque mas el color...el Rec709 es muy contrastado no??tu como has resuelto estas cosillas en Resolve???
Un saludo y un placer...Ciao!!!
#48
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
November 28, 2013, 03:52:46 PM
Quote from: immi on November 28, 2013, 02:27:38 PM
@ hdclip is it?
I too tried the raw2cdng but it works only after combining the files into a single file.
Does that raw2cdng convert all the frames from both the files?
Can you give the link for that version of raw2cdng.

thanks
http://www.phreekz.de/wordpress/2013/06/magiclantern-raw2cdng-cinema-dng/

The first file is RAW, the second, my computer recognizes it as RAR but is the extension of the first, when you get in there RAW2Cdng automatically detects and extract both two in a single folder.
The version is 1.4.6
#49
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
November 28, 2013, 09:49:55 AM
Quote from: immi on November 28, 2013, 07:45:25 AM
I face a problem. For recordings that exceed 3.99 GB the recorded file becomes unusable. Is there any corrections that were done in the recent releases.
Yesterday I record two minutes and generate 2 files, I extract with the last build of RAW2Cdng and it work's perfect...3017frames...  ;D
#50
Tragic Lantern / Re: 7D Raw Thread
November 27, 2013, 12:48:43 PM
Quote from: DFM on November 27, 2013, 11:18:05 AM
Sharpening and noise reduction in ACR applies per-image, so it depends how aggressive you are. Toning down luma noise from high ISO footage is generally OK, but if you smooth or sharpen the image too far the affected areas can be different enough between frames (at the pixel level) to introduce flicker. Some of the native video tools for sharpening and NR will peek at adjacent frames and make sure the pixel changes are gradual.

It's similar to the exposure/clarity question - in theory when you're shooting the real world, two frames should have extremely-similar contents (just with the pixels shifted a bit). Unless there's a speedlite going off you shouldn't see flickering in the footage even though the exposure slider is frame-based, as "90% of white" in frame 999 should be visually the same as in frame 1000. Push it too far and you do.

I wouldn't have any problem taking a high-ISO ML DNG sequence back to a "normal" noise/sharpness level with the ACR sliders,.
I use the acr for the correction of luminance noise and detail and I think is an excellent tool.
Davinci Resolve however I think that in this sense the image loses qualities of fine detail and noise correction, even if a more comfortable tool...