I also noticed for FRSP there are black borders on the top and left of the image, i heard that MLV_DUMP doesn't do this
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: AWPStar on November 24, 2015, 03:59:18 PMnp!
@eatbuckshot
Sorry, i was unavailable. I will research this.
Quote from: fxPPC on October 31, 2015, 04:38:40 AM
Working on creating a Mac Version (via Wine Bottler and Wine Tricks). This app looks like it is the new best thing for "developing" MLV files into Prores files for editing (since MLrawViewer stopped working for me). Got everything working UNTIL I click on the "..." to set the output path, which results in a "Runtime error '445'" and the app crashing. Very keen to get this working as it outstrips other programs by a mile.
I would be fine to continue working on packaging MLVP using Wine Bottler, but if you're using Free Basic and VB6 then I might be able to compile a native Mac app using the sources (Free Basic is cross platform and Mono supports VB for Mac). Would love to collaborate and make MLV Producer the end all utility!
Alice
Quote from: AWPStar on September 27, 2015, 08:05:50 PM
@eatbuckshot It is definitely OS problem. Command line should work.
@kutu
weird bug.
If you will try to resize main window, will it refresh these tools?
Quote from: visiono on September 22, 2015, 10:55:53 PMYou probably need to turn on exposure simulation https://vimeo.com/1944877
can someone tell me why my liveview image auto adjusts exposure as i pan it around ? i don't have ml installed yet. is this a camera feature i have to disable?
Quote from: ml-images on July 16, 2013, 10:41:58 PM
@Redrocks indeed I'm talking Canon H264 here, not ML files. So my understanding is that Canon does change ADTG/CMOS configuration for 160, 320, 640 and doesn't for 100, 200, 400 which are obtained in software post processing. Does this sound correct?
Quote from: FilmPerson on July 13, 2013, 03:05:52 AM
(I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this,so if not, my apologies!)
I was thinking about trading in my t2i for a 50d to take advantage of the raw capabilities. If I wanted to film a long project, would a hacked 50d work better than what I've got? I've been researching specs but I'm still a bit fuzzy on how stable this thing is.
Quote from: marcb on June 11, 2013, 12:51:11 PM
Wonder if HDR raw capture is possible directly to a fast CF...
I don't really understand how he got the HDR stream in Live View.
It almost looks to me like he's using that board to remote control magic lantern functions on the camera via USB.
Someone got any ideas on how his set-up works?
Quote from: aaphotog on June 18, 2013, 12:28:31 AMHave faith!
The mac version doesn't even exist. I honestly don't believe it works. No word since posting...
#ifndef _lv_rec_h_
#define _lv_rec_h_
#include "raw.h"
/* file footer data */
typedef struct
{
unsigned char magic[4];
unsigned short xRes;
unsigned short yRes;
unsigned int frameSize;
unsigned int frameCount;
unsigned int frameSkip;
unsigned int sourceFpsx1000;
unsigned int reserved3;
unsigned int reserved4;
struct raw_info raw_info;
} lv_rec_file_footer_t;
#endif
Quote from: hirethestache on June 03, 2013, 06:53:58 AM
If we could find a way to funnel the output through the cameras HDMI-out, I find it highly plausible that we could find a manufacturer with an HDMI interfaced ARM board to team up with.
Page created in 0.102 seconds with 14 queries.