Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Rewind

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15
Modules Development / Re: Full-resolution silent pictures
« on: July 02, 2014, 04:43:01 AM »
Works fine on 550D here

50 frames at 10 fps is 5 seconds, not 2. Just make a comp long enough.

In AE you don't need to perform any calculations to use Twixtor for such task.
Just follow this:
1. Enterprete your footage exactly as it was shot, e.g. 20 fps.
2. Make a comp with desired fps, e.g.  24 fps
3. put your footage into the comp and apply Twixtor. Set the Input Framerate to your footage fps (20 in our example). Leave the Speed at default 100. That's it.

Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: Premiere pro 8.0 native support?
« on: June 19, 2014, 09:52:53 AM »
That's strange, because i have both 7.2.2 and 8.0 versions installed, and 16 bit cdngs (made with raw2cdng looks exactly the same in both versions.

Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: Premiere pro 8.0 native support?
« on: June 19, 2014, 07:31:27 AM »
You no longer need to Use 12bit Cdng's as now 16bit Cdng's are now supported without any issue

Not sure, what are you talking about, because 16 bit cdngs are imported in CC 2014 exactly the same way they did in CC 7.2.
I mean they used to import perfectly fine a long time ago.

Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: Premiere pro 8.0 native support?
« on: June 19, 2014, 06:54:17 AM »
No it does not. Should it? :))

Anyone experience that.

Strange. Banding artifacts are too harsh even for 8 bit workflow. Can you share this MLV file for testing or one of dng's made with mlv2dng?

General Development / Re: Getting started with development
« on: June 12, 2014, 05:36:12 PM »
... resolved by installing docutils

Thanks a lot! It works now.

General Development / Re: Getting started with development
« on: June 12, 2014, 04:03:02 PM »
Guys, what am I doing wrong?

Post-processing Workflow / Re: Workflow Tips - After Effects
« on: June 12, 2014, 01:02:56 PM »
...for example color finesse with all the scopes.

Btw, you can use SA Color Finesse in Premiere Pro too.

However, ACR is still preferable way of interpreting raw files if you concerned in detail quality (based on my own experience and experiments) With ACR I can get perceptible better results compared to direct import cdng's into Premiere (debayering, highlights treatment, high frequency color detail)
Also, ACR has advanced bad pixel removal algorithms, which allows the users of 650D, EOS-M and similar automatically deal with focusing pixels in overexposed areas, which makes it arguably the only tool for initial raw processing for now (for those users)

Raw Video / Re: 650D/T4i Raw Video
« on: June 08, 2014, 10:43:11 PM »
That's impossible...

Confirm these cards are just fine for 720p continuous. Their write speeds benchmarks in ML test about 40 MB/s (controller limit)
Manufacturer's write speed claim is 45 MB/s, which is true (confirmed on usb 3.0 card reader)

Was this with .RAW files or .MLV? There was a bug with .RAW exports to MOV which will be fixed in the next release.

Oh, forgot that — yes, it was *.raw. Thank you.

Every time I try to export to mov, I get crash with the following:

The error is consistent for 1.1.4 - 1.1.6 versions , deleting the .mlrawviewer from user folder doesn't help.
Win 8.1 x64, UAC disabled
works with dng's though

Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 650D/T4i 1.0.4 [Status: Alpha]
« on: April 30, 2014, 07:20:21 AM »
Think we'll get the dual ISO thing on a future nightly for this camera?

What do you mean? Dual ISO works for 650D for at least half a year both for photo and video modes.

Raw Video / Re: 650D/T4i Raw Video
« on: April 27, 2014, 04:27:10 PM »
I'd say journalists wants to record sound in-camera more often than filmmakers. Filmmakers used to have external recorders )) But anyway, in order to PDR work properly, you need 4x resolutions (1536 x 640 or 1568 x 656 works just fine with my modified raw_rec). You may change mlv_rec by yourself and compile, or ask some of the developers to add some resolution choices into the builds.
Another option is obviously update the PDR tool according to res. changes, but again, enough java for me )

Raw Video / Re: 650D/T4i Raw Video
« on: April 27, 2014, 03:55:27 PM »
Just for comparison:

resolution               MLV_rec time          RAW_rec time
1536 x 642             23 sec
1536 x 640                                            83 sec
1568 x 656                                            32 sec

MLV is for big brothers. 650D feels better with raw_rec.

Raw Video / Re: 650D/T4i Raw Video
« on: April 27, 2014, 03:38:33 PM »
I convert MLV to dng and then use PDR but it is not removing the dots. Seems like the tool is not useable anymore...

MLV is not usable on 650D, because it's slower. PDR works fine for resolutions which are the multiples of 4. For better performance use x16, eg 1536x640 for cinemascope.

Feature Requests / Re: Canon 7d Display Invert
« on: April 27, 2014, 07:40:27 AM »
Display — Advanced Settings — UpsideDown Mode

Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: PinkDotRemover tool 650D
« on: April 10, 2014, 12:58:07 PM »
i'm using modified raw_rec build. Resolution choices are in the begining of the file. Just edit them, add the resolutions whatever you want and compile.
Default res. choices are not particularly good for SD cameras.

Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: PinkDotRemover tool 650D
« on: April 10, 2014, 08:30:25 AM »
PDR works fine for resolutions multiples of 4.
For example, for cinemascope, i'm using 1536 x 640 on my 650D, which is exact (2.4:1)

a quick question I stumbled upon yesterday. The version of Prores Mlrawviewer uses is 4:2:2 LT, isn't it? Why not 4:4:4, or would that exceed the amount of information stored within the .mlv?


Yes, silent pics from live view - it's already in ML. The problem is that these silent raw dngs have low resolution, and my nagging to re-implement a high-res mode (matrix like old 422 or something new) weren't heard by the gods yet :-p

Topicstarter does not interested in photos. And he is asking about shutter lock up in open state even with camera off. Silent pics are helpless for him I think ))

Mirror has nothing to do with shutter (for example, you can lock up the mirror with VAF filter, but shutter count will continue counting, because shutter opens and closes anyway)

The shutter's free state is closed, so opening shutter is power-consuming process. How do you exactly realize that shutter stays always open even with the camera off? You can just lock it mechanically.

Or you may probably just remove it ))
By the way why bother if you don't make photos with this camera?

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15