Messages

on the other hand it foorgol it worked with me on CMD

Foorgol, I'm getting an error when I double-click the .jar file

same here

no, sorry, that tool isn't useful for that case. the dead pixel detection of the raw editor or your choice should solve that problem.

Both do the best job so far. But foorgol from what I know is still wokring on it, so I believe if foorgol finish it it will be the best thing on its own

Nanomad, sorry if this is a stupid question but how do you shoot in zoom mode on the 650D?

use the zoom key on your camera to zoom to 5X. Only that. Believe it or not.

Disabled FPS overcranking, now optimize for exact FPS should be working again

Thats some good news!

Optimize for low light. Exact FPS needs more tweaking on my side

ok, thanks nanomad

I tried to FPS override to 24 exact frames on 22nd Satriani build and it crashed giving me those logs

Code Select Expand

http://speedy.sh/wMkNm/LOG000.LOG

Code Select Expand

http://speedy.sh/4Htkf/CRASH00.LOG

No one have any idea about  Reply #254 

1. Put the card in the camera and do a low lever format
2. Copy the latest ML build in the card, also dont forget to copy the 650D-safe-dumper.fir
3. After you copied those files run the eoscard.exe and select a) eos_develop b) boodisk and save. Also refresh just to make sure both are chosen.

After that you should be fine.

Finally it works! thanks for this a lot Foorgol! Though I noticed, that dots are being removed very very well at the center of the image whereas at the two sides many dots are still here. I guess you have not tackled those yet?

Thanks again!

For all of you who got that error: could you please download this version

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22843507/MagicLantern/PinkDotRemover_debug.zip

and send me the output via PM?

Please maximize the terminal window, because the debug texts can become quite long...

Thanks a lot!

There you go mate, I only skipped one line at the very top, which was the command in order to include it all in one screenshot



Thanks a lot for doing that!

And satriani, you are an angel!

If you don't understand how ExpSim works, that does not count as a ML bug. If LiveView refreshes 30 (or 60?) times per second, how can it have the same brightness as a 1/6-second exposure? Obviously, by bumping ISO to astronomical values.

This is why I said so many times that you should not record video in photo mode (and nobody believed me).

Only in movie mode, the exposure values displayed on the screen are the same values used for silent pics.

And even there, the downsampling process (line skipping) increases the noise, compared to a regular picture. Plus, you were comparing a raw to a jpeg (raw unprocessed and jpeg with noise reduction applied).

Thanks for the reply Alex! I'm noob on those things but I'm learning slowly. I never realised liveview was so hard-connected to pics, I thought it was only just a preview. As for distorion I get on pictures on photo mode, can you help me on that?

Thanks for the answers people on my raw question

Now I was wondering, when I take a silent pic on photo mode it is way different than movie mode. And that is without Rec_raw activated.

To explain the resolution on photo mode is 1734*695 and the pictures looks really streeetched! Aspect ration is all sorts of wrong, whereas on movie mode the resolution is 1734*1158 and the pictures looks fine. Is this a bug? Or do I need to do something when I take silend pics on photo mode?

And I believe all the noise I get on silent pic is a kind of bug. I just tested taking a picture on Iso 100, shutter speed 1/6 (indoor picture) on a tripod. And the pic still has noise just like iso 1600! Though whats wierd when I take outdoor picture naturally shutter speed goes way faster. There is no noise. But Iso is always 100. I also tested outdoor picture 1600 iso with extremely high shutter speed and no noise either.

It's almost as if noise on silent pic is relevant to shutter rather than iso. The slower the shutter speed the more noise you have?

Besides a lot of noise in the first image, I see some aliasing and last but not least, compressed vertical dimensions...

Yeah for some reason the ML raw as it comes out of the card its dimensions are way to streched so I had to compress it to make it look a little natural.

[I said on an earlier post that raw silent pictures seems to have to much noise on high ISO, (other than the pink dots known bug) Here is an example. The first picture is from ML Silent pic ISO 1600]

I said on an earlier post that raw silent pictures seems to have to much noise on high ISO, (other than the pink dots known bug) Here is an example. The first picture is  from ML Silent pic ISO 1600


And this picture is not even a raw! this is jpeg on Small Size from the canon menu, ISO 1600 also



There is absolutely no proccesing or whatsoever on each picture. Is it normal?

Hi foorgol, i get this error

what am I doing wrong? I have java 7 upd 21
For shooting mode used "silent picture"

exact same problem here

Ok guys, time to bother you with a new version of the pink dot remover! This time I added the dot locations for the silent DNGs. So now the program can process both, 1280x720 and 1734x965. Here's a "before" and "after" example of a silent DNG with identical RAW development settings and corrected aspect ratio:




Here's the binary, just unzip it and run java -jar PinkDotRemover.jar <YourFileNameOrDirectory> in the shell:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22843507/MagicLantern/PinkDotRemover__003.zip

Source code:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22843507/MagicLantern/PinkDotRemover__003.src.zip
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22843507/MagicLantern/SimpleTIFFlib__003.src.zip

By the way: I was wrong in one of my previous posts; the programm definitely requires Java 1.7... sorry...

Foorgol I have the latest java installed on my system. So when I go on CMD and CD to the pindotremover folder when I Write the code you mentioned above it says "bad command, unreconisable"

live view doesnt cover the whole sensor? I dont get it. But anyway is the extra noise I get at higher iso result of the lower resolution raw?

I assume ML silent pic Raw and Video raw is the same thing, right? just streamable. Any of those ML raw DNG either silent pic or extracted from Video. Compared to Original Canon Photo Raw has much more noise overall. Other than the known bug of pink dots.

Lets just say for the sake of the arguement I took a photo on iso 800 with silent pic RAW and the same photo with Canon RAW. When I put them on photoshop I match the pixel size for a more fair comparison. And the ML raw has so much more noise then the canon.

i know what you mean! But I was actually comparing it with canon raw. not jpeg

i wodering, Beside the know bug for the pink lines, will the general quality of raw go up with updates?

It seems to me raw, silent pic or video for that matter adds much more noise than original canon one.

New question I just cant solve, nomatter how hard I look an asnwer on the internet and forums.

Why would anyone use Silent Pic 14bit instead of Canon Raw CR2 other than it is silent?

I noticed vertical stripes when I recorded a sunset timelapse with FPS override. The stripes where all over the image and only occurred when it was (almost) dark. I wasn't sure if it was due to the long recording time of nearly 45 minutes or due to the dark environment...

Mate can you create a step to step guide for us who never used java before?

guys its still an alpha. and as I asked earlier does anyone know how many bits is canon raw? opposed to the 14bit silent DNG?

guys can anyone explain to me a little about this 14bit silent pic?

I realise its a raw dng. Is the original CR2 raw from my not 14bit and if not how much is it? And lastly how does one change the size of the silent pic and correct the aspect ratio too?

Pls at least if anyone answer the first question! too curious and cant find anything on the internet on a quick search!

just out of curiosity here! whenever that is, comes the next version. what is it gonna be prealpha 3 or alpha?